Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Nationals\s+on\s+Asphalt\?\s+$Was\:\s+rolling\s+cars\s+in\s+autocross$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Nationals\s+on\s+Asphalt\?\s+$Was\:\s+rolling\s+cars\s+in\s+autocross$\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Brian M Kennedy <kennedy@i2.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 08:40:02 -0500; Perhaps this is a good time to ask: why not have Nationals on asphalt? Points for asphalt: 1) It is easier on tires -- less expense. 2) It is easier on the cars -- less expense and less likelihood o; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01482.html (10,142 bytes)
2. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 09:54:51 -0400; I wonder about the future of Topeka as the Nationals site. It struck me as way too rough and brittle for the BIG SHOW. The South course had to be modified significantly during one of the days to avoi; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01483.html (10,316 bytes)
3. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 09:08:36 -0500; Not necessarily. Depends on the type of asphalt. I've seen quite a few asphalt-paved sites that are incredibly hard on tires. Asphalt-gravel composite pavement has this potential, depending on the ki; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01484.html (9,408 bytes)
4. RE: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Alan Pozner <AlanP@identicard.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 10:21:58 -0400; I wasn't there but the pictures I saw had tons of concrete debris near the course. That indicates to me that the surface on course must have had numerous irregularities. The kind that get me nervous; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01487.html (8,827 bytes)
5. RE: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Phil Osborne <posborne@minuteman-ups.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 10:13:49 -0500; My vote would be one course on concrete, and one on asphalt... Best of both worlds. Phil O. have Nationals on asphalt. But it won't necessarily be safer or easier on tires. Jay <; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01495.html (8,915 bytes)
6. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Jamie Sculerati <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 11:09:33 -0400 (EDT); I'm not sure that it is -- I think the concrete surface is dictated by the available site choices. If you're trying to set up a week-long event for 1000 people including camping and two courses, wher; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01497.html (9,317 bytes)
7. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 12:28:38 EDT; by << Perhaps this is a good time to ask: why not have Nationals on asphalt? >> It has been brought up, and I thought one course on each would have been cool. Use the south course as Paddock, and the; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01504.html (13,915 bytes)
8. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 12:28:39 EDT; <> << I wasn't there but the pictures I saw had tons of concrete debris near the course. That indicates to me that the surface on course must have had numerous irregularities. The kind that get me ne; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01505.html (10,556 bytes)
9. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:36:33 -0400; Wow, I hadn't heard about that. When did that happen exactly, and what was the nature of the change? Thanks... Mark; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01513.html (9,441 bytes)
10. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:40:20 -0400; Just to be sure credit is given where credit is due... "They", in this case, is Chief of Pavement Integrity Bob Barone (runs in AM, from NER) and his team. Course designers Karen Babb and Roger Johns; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01514.html (9,872 bytes)
11. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:41:23 -0400; It's a very thin skimcoat of asphalt over concrete. The MTAA will not allow us to use it as a course area. Mark; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01516.html (9,620 bytes)
12. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:55:21 EDT; Wow, I hadn't heard about that. When did that happen exactly, and what was the nature of the change? It was the final 180 degree hairpin that led back to the finish area. It was circled before compe; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01520.html (10,233 bytes)
13. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 14:16:04 -0400; It was changed in between the forth and fifth heat. An extra ten minutes was allowed for competitors to re-walk the turn. I announced the change, the extra time, and that the course would return to t; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01523.html (10,663 bytes)
14. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 15:07:39 -0400; The change was enough to make a first gear turn into a second gear turn for some cars -like Turbo Supras, for example :-). The course change didn't affect the results, but it will have an impact on c; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01526.html (10,359 bytes)
15. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 15:14:10 -0400; Could someone explain for me which cones (by number) moved, how far, and in what direction? Just curious. Thanks... Mark; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01528.html (9,495 bytes)
16. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 15:20:27 EDT; << Could someone explain for me which cones (by number) moved, how far, and in what direction? Slow day at work, eh? M Sipe :-); /html/autox/1999-09/msg01530.html (9,249 bytes)
17. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 15:28:21 -0400; I believe it was #194 (or #196). Matt Murray mailto:mattm@optonline.net mailto:mdmurray@gwns.com; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01531.html (9,918 bytes)
18. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <Loren@kscable.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 15:49:56 -0500; If this year's Nationals courses were any indication (and I expect that they were), the tendency is for there to be one really fast "power" course and one fairly twisty "handling" course. (no, I'm no; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01547.html (9,812 bytes)
19. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <Loren@kscable.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 15:55:00 -0500; You are indeed a brilliant man, Phil! -- Loren Williams | Homepage - http://home.kscable.com/shad '94 Saturn SC2 | Wichita Region SCCA - http://www2.southwind.net/~scca; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01548.html (9,096 bytes)
20. Re: Nationals on Asphalt? (Was: rolling cars in autocross) (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 17:08:55 -0400; Hmmm. I could swear that just yesterday, I explained that the MTAA will not allow us to run on the asphalt at Forbes. It's just a thin skimcoat over the concrete. Mark; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01550.html (9,053 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]