Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Healey\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Healey\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. New Healey? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Svilans" <peter.svilans@rogers.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:36:13 -0400; http://www.autoblog.com/entry/1234000130059913/; /html/healeys/2005-10/msg00163.html (6,245 bytes)
2. New Healey? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Ryan" <ryan@jimryan.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:59:08 -0400; http://www.autoblog.com/entry/1234000130059913/ -jtpr '64 BJ7 )?),; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00686.html (6,529 bytes)
3. Re: New Healey? (score: 1): Author: Richard Hosmer <rahosmer@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:35:42 -0700; Wow, I HOPE not - to MY eye, that thing is UGGGGly!!! Dick Hosmer BT718556; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00688.html (6,415 bytes)
4. RE: New Healey? (score: 1): Author: "William Moyer" <William.Moyer@millersville.edu>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:41:11 -0400; Healeys are "defunct"? My dictionary defines that as "no longer in use, non-existent". That seems a bit harsh. Murdered by British Leyland and American regulatory kooks maybe, but certainly not "defu; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00695.html (7,556 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]