- 1. New addition (score: 1)
- Author: Susan Hensley <susan@imagin.net>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 21:51:04 -0600
- Hi all! I happen to find Triumph racers from time to time on email, and found Matt a couple of weeks ago (sorry about being slow, Matt!). He sounds like a great addition to the list, so would ya'll p
- /html/fot/1998-11/msg00151.html (8,144 bytes)
- 2. RE: New addition (score: 1)
- Author: Alexander Joseph H <AlexanderJosephH@Waterloo.deere.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 09:09:17 -0600
- Another potential member of the infamous "Spitfire Squadron" Hi all! I happen to find Triumph racers from time to time on email, and found Matt a couple of weeks ago (sorry about being slow, Matt!).
- /html/fot/1998-11/msg00157.html (8,567 bytes)
- 3. Re: New addition (score: 1)
- Author: "greg solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 02:36:35 -0800
- This doesn't sound like a vintage car to me! None of those mods were legal 1975. What are we doing , racing vintage cars or racing old cars with no rules! I am sure there is a proper place to race a
- /html/fot/1998-11/msg00166.html (9,346 bytes)
- 4. Re: New addition (score: 1)
- Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 07:30:28 -0500
- Uhhhh, Greg - not all of us on this list are vintage racers. This is a list for "triumph racers" not "triumph vintage racers". I suspect that Matt and Mike are running their Spit in SCCA's F-Prod cla
- /html/fot/1998-11/msg00167.html (7,342 bytes)
- 5. Re: New addition (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Taylor <n196x@mindspring.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:46:24 -0500
- Uhhhh, John - I'd like to think that there is a little room left on the list to accommodate Triumph Vintage Racers too, don'tcha think? Richard Taylor racers"......
- /html/fot/1998-11/msg00170.html (7,415 bytes)
- 6. Re: New addition (score: 1)
- Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 10:38:42 -0500
- I'm not excluding "triumph vintage racers" - they are a subset of "triumph racers" and are explicityly included in the larger group of "triumph racers". However, "triumph vintage racers" excludes all
- /html/fot/1998-11/msg00173.html (7,631 bytes)
- 7. Re: New addition (score: 1)
- Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 11:55:31 -0500
- My apologies to anyone that I may have offended - in my earlier post, I should have said something more like "this is a list for "triumph racers" not *only* "triumph vintage racers"" What a differenc
- /html/fot/1998-11/msg00177.html (7,604 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu