Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+LBC\,\s+Spam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+LBC\,\s+Spam\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. No LBC, Spam (score: 1): Author: "Larry Daniels" <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 07:49:27 -0500; I know there are some 'puter geeks out there that can help me with this. I have been getting inundated with spam lately. It is not unusual for 30% to 40% of my email to be spam. This morning it was 6; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00338.html (7,473 bytes)
2. RE: No LBC, Spam (score: 1): Author: "Jacques Le Clainche" <hobbycars@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 06:11:51 -0700; I have not found a program that does not stop some of the "good emails", and neither has my wife, who is a software consultant for HP. At home, we use a program named Qurb. It works very well, catch; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00339.html (7,929 bytes)
3. Re: No LBC, Spam (score: 1): Author: "Brad Fornal" <tequila.brad@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:25:41 -0500; First, I believe I still have a program called HD Killer. Theoretically, you return it to the sender of the spam, and it will destroy their hard drive. I mentioned it to someone prior to using it, an; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00341.html (8,738 bytes)
4. Re: No LBC, Spam (score: 1): Author: derf <derf247@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:22:01 -0500; I, too, use gmail with good results. It catches 90-95% of spam up front. I have yet to have anything in the spam folder that should have been in the inbox. I get one or two in the inbox that should b; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00343.html (7,574 bytes)
5. Re: No LBC, Spam (score: 1): Author: Billy Zoom <billyzoom@billyzoom.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 07:26:14 -0700; 60% is still good. I get 300 to 400 spams every day. BZ; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00344.html (6,949 bytes)
6. Re: No LBC, Spam (score: 1): Author: "Larry Daniels" <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:53:09 -0500; I guess fame comes at a price, huh, Billy? I wouldn't trade with you. Thanks, all, for the suggestions. Brad, I'll try a few filters. If that doesn't do the trick, I'll get back about the gmail. LD 6; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00345.html (7,472 bytes)
7. Re: No LBC, Spam (score: 1): Author: Bill L <pythias@pacifier.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:02:29 -0700; Hello Larry, one of the problems is that if you are using MicroSoft Explorer and OUTLOOK? if so they are integrated such that whenever you visit a websight, those at the other end can harvest your em; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00346.html (8,032 bytes)
8. Re: No LBC, Spam (score: 1): Author: derf <derf247@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:42:19 -0500; I use Firefox, too. It is an open source free program that I prefer over Explorer. It's one of those "try it and you'll like it" things.; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00347.html (6,932 bytes)
9. Re: No LBC, Spam (score: 1): Author: RBHouston@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:08:45 EDT; I hear that spam filters end up taking out some non-spam email along with the spam. Are there any filters that work well w/o junking the good stuff? LD I'm at home on the laptopand don't have the nam; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00348.html (7,895 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]