Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ok\,\s+This\s+is\s+how\s+we\s+deal\s+with\s+the\s+shock\s+issue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ok\,\s+This\s+is\s+how\s+we\s+deal\s+with\s+the\s+shock\s+issue\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Ok, This is how we deal with the shock issue (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:17:05 EST; I am not shooting arrows for the fun of it. I have seriously grave doubts regarding this polling proposal. a) There is nothing *scientific* about a poll. Calculating the numbers accurately, determin; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00325.html (10,604 bytes)
2. Re: Ok, This is how we deal with the shock issue (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:45:08 EST; Yeah... I guess my deal with this is exactly what Mark is saying... if it is a predetermined list... it is all in the wording... which can easily sway people to choose things that may 'sound' good...; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00331.html (12,870 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]