- 1. Passengers in TR (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Rochlin" <r_rochlin@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:59:49 -0500
- To me the real heart of the matter is not if you can put more than on child in a TR and get away with it legally, but the turmoil and heartache if a child was seriously hurt in the event of an unfort
- /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00352.html (7,040 bytes)
- 2. Re: Passengers in TR (score: 1)
- Author: Steven Newell <steven@newellboys.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:24:59 -0700
- No, I wouldn't. But that's a fair and thoughtful point, Bob. Personally I don't believe that I or my passengers are inherently in more danger riding in a TR than in a modern car. While modern cars ha
- /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00355.html (8,176 bytes)
- 3. Re: Passengers in TR (score: 1)
- Author: "WebmasterRick" <WebmasterRick@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:34:55 -0600
- Absolutly AGREED, Steve!!!!!!!!! <<Not to be glib, but I don't think that shows a lack of judgement.>> Check out what Ed (my boss) drives in "Special People & Special Car" at www.justbrits.com !!! BT
- /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00359.html (6,995 bytes)
- 4. Re: Passengers in TR (score: 1)
- Author: "Kurtis" <tr4driver@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:36:57 -0600
- I agree. As I stated previously, I'm not entirely comfortable carrying my children in my TR4 (which is probably the way it should be... makes me extra cautious). I recognize the fact that auto safety
- /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00365.html (8,872 bytes)
- 5. Re: Passengers in TR (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
- Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:46:17 -0600
- I recall such an ad with a Spitfire. It is a conventional-looking side view in super-slow motion of the Spit nearing a concrete barrier. The car passes harmlessly, and the British-accented announcer
- /html/triumphs/2005-03/msg00383.html (7,337 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu