- 1. Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: "W. Ray Gibbons" <gibbons@northpole.med.uvm.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 16:27:13 -0400 (EDT)
- The idea that LBCs might be a drag on the market in Germany is interesting, but I am worried about closer to home. As I toy with the idea of buying another car for rainy days, one concern is that I n
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00135.html (8,942 bytes)
- 2. Re: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins)
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 16:06:24 -0500 (PDT)
- A vehicle which has undergone an engine swap must meet the pollution regs for the later of either the chassis or the engine. In your example, the '68 engine would have to meet '72 specs. (One of the
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00141.html (9,572 bytes)
- 3. Re: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: Johnmowog@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 17:12:31 -0400
- Welcome to our nightmare! Here in the Peoples Republic of California, smog checks came slowly, only in the most polluted areas (read LA and SF) of the state. First. Now of course they are everywhere,
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00142.html (8,885 bytes)
- 4. Re: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: Johnmowog@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 17:18:27 -0400
- to be added to my previous (somewhat doomsday) message "other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, How DID you like the play?"
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00143.html (7,275 bytes)
- 5. RE: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: "rbusche" <rbusche@smtpgw.sim.ES.COM>
- Date: 8 Jun 1995 15:27:56 -0700
- I don't know about other states, but here in Utah cars older than 1968 are exepmt from testing (and modification). Technically if a 72 engine is installed in a 68 than you are correct that the emiss
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00147.html (7,857 bytes)
- 6. Re: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: John Eric Lifsey <mat1000a@frank.mtsu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 22:54:35 -0500 (CDT)
- Visual checks and testing are included for cars 75 and on in the Nashville area of Tennessee. 74's are exempt.
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00157.html (7,345 bytes)
- 7. Re: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 95 08:45:45 -0700
- There is one loophole in California's SMOG regs no one has yet mentioned. Here you are required to have the car SMOGed every other year. If the car is liscensed and on the road during a year it does
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00170.html (8,554 bytes)
- 8. Re: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrington.com (Mark Jurras)
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 1995 12:16:20 -0400
- or take the VIN# off a parts car and re-register the same car. Every year you swap the license plate and VIN plate. - -Mark "No officer that was my other White MG" Jurras = =o&o = =o&o
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00174.html (8,881 bytes)
- 9. Re: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: Douglas Tietz <dwtietz@ucdavis.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 1995 13:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
- Commonly they won't let you put an engine in it that's older than the car. In other words, a '68 MGB with a '72 engine would be okay, but not the other way around. Has to do with not putting an engin
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00188.html (7,825 bytes)
- 10. Re: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: ek_john_luthy <luthy@cesd.servtech.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 1995 01:20:48 -0400 (EDT)
- I live in CA. I own 8 cars. I keep 2 cars in current registration. 5 of my cars are required to meet smog standards, and get tested. Every time I "activate" on of the cars that is in stand-by mode an
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00202.html (9,279 bytes)
- 11. Re: Pollution equipment (score: 1)
- Author: Johnmowog@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 02:29:36 -0400
- year Are you offering a MGBV8 for cheap? Please? Pretty Please??? Does the TR6V8 have cracked front lower A Arm mounts??? You do make a good point, and it is *almost* feasible for those of us who ke
- /html/mgs/1995-06/msg00264.html (8,217 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu