Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proper\s+car\s+classifications\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Pylon\s+for\s+October\s+$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proper\s+car\s+classifications\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Pylon\s+for\s+October\s+$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Proper car classifications (was Re: Pylon for October ) (score: 1): Author: Todd Green <tag@cs.utah.edu>; Date: Thu, 04 Nov 1999 10:39:22 -0700; While we are nit picking, where is it written that a car will perform equally on a road course as it does in the Solo II format? I'd love to see some of the CSP Hondas come play with our M3's at Wil; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00189.html (7,718 bytes)
2. Re: Proper car classifications (was Re: Pylon for October ) (score: 1): Author: Paul Czarnecki <oblique@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 12:59:59 -0500; I agree. I remember being on the road course at NHIS in an ITC (slow) Honda CRX running in CSP and seeing the ITA (fast) Mazda RX-2 classed in DSP. Solo II classes are not the same as Road course (R; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00190.html (7,207 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]