Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proposal\s+for\s+SP\s+cars\s+to\s+compete\s+in\s+P\s+\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proposal\s+for\s+SP\s+cars\s+to\s+compete\s+in\s+P\s+\?\?\?\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

1. Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "M. Soar" <msoar@home.com>; Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:02:59 -0700; Two extremely cryptic sentences appear in the on-line version of the November FasTrack: "The PAC is considering a proposal to accommodate Street Prepared cars (which are not subject to the wheel size; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00115.html (8,571 bytes)
2. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: SOLOMIATA@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 20:04:25 EDT; I would like to know too. As someone who recently made the transition from CSP to DP I think I have an interest. I can only assume that HQ is planning to make STR the new SP class and is giving all c; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00116.html (8,261 bytes)
3. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@home.com>; Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:12:10 -0700; Just a guess: Sounds like the PAC is trying to fill up the sparse Prepared classes with something new?? --Pat K -- /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text messa; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00117.html (9,845 bytes)
4. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:37:48 -0700; If they could get the rules into at least the 90's the classes might begin to fill up... Like, allowing some normal size wheels... 17" 18" 19" etc... or how about fuel injection? The prepared rules j; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00119.html (11,341 bytes)
5. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier"<pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 00:55:34 GMT; They don't make much sense to us in the Twin Cities, so we basically ignore them. Our prepared rules are very loose. Probably cause armageddon if they did it this way nationally, but it works for us; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00120.html (8,914 bytes)
6. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 22:18:34 -0400; Wow.. All this talk about "undersubscribed" Prepared classes.... Anyone remember what the largest class this year was? Anyone remember what the largest class LAST year was? That said, I do think ther; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00123.html (12,800 bytes)
7. RE: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 21:39:17 -0500; I would like to know too. As someone who recently made the transition from CSP to DP I think I have an interest. I can only assume that HQ is planning to make STR the new SP class and is giving all; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00124.html (10,158 bytes)
8. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 22:56:43 EDT; God help us... CP+ESP = 94 cars at the Nationals this year... CHD /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing i; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00125.html (9,117 bytes)
9. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@home.com>; Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 19:53:14 -0700; -- /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// unsubscribe autox /// /// or try http://www.t; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00126.html (9,854 bytes)
10. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 22:14:17 -0500; Maybe because you want to run in SP. Lots of us do. Lots of engines are less expensive to build in SP-legal form than Porsches. Where did you get the "stock motor" and "$8k suspension" ideas? SP allo; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00127.html (11,738 bytes)
11. RE: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 23:01:59 -0500; Jay has some good points, I'll clearify where my point wasn't clear. << Maybe because you want to run in SP. Lots of us do. Lots of engines are less expensive to build in SP-legal form than Porsches.; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00128.html (11,260 bytes)
12. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:12:16 EDT; Funny, I don't remember any stock European cars that did low 13 quarter miles in the 60's... CHD /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@au; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00130.html (9,724 bytes)
13. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 07:10:18 -0500; Who said _anything_ about stock? I was referring to highly modified cars. This was to point out that "modern" enthusiast modifications like engine swaps have been going on since the '50s. In any case; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00131.html (9,973 bytes)
14. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 07:47:37 -0500; Most "normally expendable" parts in an engine - rings, valve stem seals, bearings, valves - can legally be replaced by parts from sources other than the manufacturer, even in Stock, as long as the re; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00132.html (11,065 bytes)
15. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Haden" <bhaden@ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:38:27 -0700; My first thought is that a weight penalty is an intellectual excercise here because SP does NOT have weight specs in its rules. How much does it have to weigh? You would have to know the shipping wei; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00135.html (10,678 bytes)
16. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Haden" <bhaden@ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:50:24 -0700; . Is it really fair to ask the kid who YES. Although I can admire the effort put into such a conversion, anyone who performs such a swap should have a clue beforehand that the car will no longer be a; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00137.html (10,241 bytes)
17. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Haden" <bhaden@ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:59:08 -0700; most miles There weren't many American ones that would either unless they were VERY well "prepared" by the factory or one of its "contractors"! EG; the Boss 302 and original Z-28 were mid 14 cars in; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00138.html (10,077 bytes)
18. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: brandon.fetch@ey.com; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:26:09 -0500; Weren't the 69-72 Mopar Hemi E- and B- bodies able to break the high 13s even with those old bias-ply tires? Obviously the altered wheelbase A-bodies we're in the 13s in stock form, but didn't you ha; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00139.html (10,417 bytes)
19. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "gs96" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 12:35:52 -0400; Bruce, I imagine the weight penalty is based on the published minimums for Prepared cars. For example if the minimum weight for my car in AP trim is 2200 lbs and I want to run AP but in SP trim I mig; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00140.html (10,723 bytes)
20. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Haden" <bhaden@ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:53:07 -0700; Could be. I was in high school when all these cars were coming out and as I recall those 13 sec times were generally done at the hands of a drag oriented buch of tuners who played with tires, advance; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00141.html (11,815 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]