Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Reliability\s+of\s+British\s+Vehicles\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Reliability of British Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: "Erich" <erich@mail.NGBM.COM>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:43:29 -0400
Hello All, An interesting thing happened to my wife and I this week. It started Thursday when I received a call at work from my wife Alice. Both her Jeep and our back up car, a Chevy Caprice Classic,
/html/mgs/2000-10/msg00012.html (8,036 bytes)

2. Re: Reliability of British Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: "James Nazarian Jr" <james.nazarian@colorado.edu>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:35:45 -0600
my guess is the O2 sensor, when they go bad this is exactly what happens. my '96 cherokee went through this once. James Nazarian 71 B Roadster 71 BGT 63 Buick 215 "Aerodynamics are for people who can
/html/mgs/2000-10/msg00015.html (8,811 bytes)

3. Re: Reliability of British Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: JustBrits@aol.com
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:08:08 EDT
<< Anyone know about fuel injected models (I-6 4.0 Cherokee)? >> Nope, Erich (and don't want too!!<G>). That said, you "expected" your LBV(vehicles) to NOT run?!?! Better than any "New" piece of Cr*p
/html/mgs/2000-10/msg00026.html (7,657 bytes)

4. Re: Reliability of British Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:49:04 -0400
What Ed! You don't drive an English car every day! And an El Camino at that... ;-) Seriously, my TR-6 has been incredibly reliable this year as a daily driver. So far the maintenance bill hasn't sur
/html/mgs/2000-10/msg00034.html (8,503 bytes)

5. Re: Reliability of British Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: Hlsinger@aol.com
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:21:55 EDT
any Probably is O2 sensors. You will have at least two and maybe as many as six. After 95, most seem to have four. It has been the first on many minor sensor problems on the Explorers we run at work.
/html/mgs/2000-10/msg00044.html (8,820 bytes)

6. Re: Reliability of British Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: Pointparty@aol.com
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:57:13 EDT
Erich: We have among others, a 71 MGB GT which is very reliable as a semi regular driver and a 91 Jeep Cherokee with the I-6 4.0 engine which 18 year old sone now drives. He experienced the same prob
/html/mgs/2000-10/msg00045.html (7,885 bytes)

7. Re: Reliability of British Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: LBCarCoMail@aol.com
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:19:57 EDT
As far as reliablity of our LBC's I find them to be very reliable as I drive each of mine all the time and most often tow a trailer with them. As long as the cars are maintained they should not have
/html/mgs/2000-10/msg00047.html (7,986 bytes)

8. Re: Reliability of British Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: Jon <a77mgb@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
My Jeep has never stranded me, of course it may be of a slightly different design. I'll ahve to take it apart someday and see... jon (aka High Hood Boy, HHB, -0||||0-) == 77 MGB "basketcase" 58 Will
/html/mgs/2000-10/msg00050.html (8,127 bytes)

9. RE: Reliability of British Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: Gordon Bird <gb@the-bdc.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:19:21 -0400
So, does it count as 2 failures when you put the same defective fuel pump back on a car and it fails *again*? 8*) Ah, but what a way to demonstrate the new US$47(?) spare fuel pump that is currently
/html/mgs/2000-10/msg00102.html (7,697 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu