- 1. Reproduction License Plates (score: 1)
- Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:03:36 -0500
- Since I'm about to actually plate my 67 B for the first time, I've got a I've checked ebay, and they do have some decent quality vintage 67 Ohio plates, but something occurs to me. Here in Ohio, I ca
- /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00620.html (7,610 bytes)
- 2. Re: Reproduction License Plates (score: 1)
- Author: Zubrovka <zubrovka@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:27:22 -0600
- I haven't even thought about that before but it would be kind of cool to have 76 Bi Centenial plates on my 76 B! John /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/m
- /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00621.html (8,016 bytes)
- 3. Re: Reproduction License Plates (score: 1)
- Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:50:46 -0500
- Of course, a bit more time on google and all this becomes moot. A closer reading of the Ohio Revised Code showed me that I'm out of luck. Not only do the plates have to be "Legible and issued by this
- /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00622.html (8,093 bytes)
- 4. Re: Reproduction License Plates (score: 1)
- Author: MGTD1952@cs.com
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:56:03 EST
- << heh, I haven't even thought about that before but it would be kind of cool to have 76 Bi Centenial plates on my 76 B! John >> Speaking of BiCentennial Plates, remember every state issued a special
- /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00625.html (7,512 bytes)
- 5. Re: Reproduction License Plates (score: 1)
- Author: MGTD1952@cs.com
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:02:14 EST
- << n a message dated 2/20/02 5:32:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, zubrovka@earthlink.net writes: << heh, I haven't even thought about that before but it would be kind of cool to have 76 Bi Centenial pla
- /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00626.html (7,957 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu