Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rev\s+limiter\s+revisited\-Pertronix\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rev\s+limiter\s+revisited\-Pertronix\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Rev limiter revisited-Pertronix (score: 1): Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:56:17 GMT; I had a Pertronix unit fail on me last week in my street TR4. Good thing I kept the points with me in the glove box and was able to swap them out on the side of the highway. The Pertronix ran great u; /html/fot/2004-09/msg00084.html (10,054 bytes)
2. RE: Rev limiter revisited-Pertronix (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:20:33 -0700; Wow. This is really interesting--these things should be rock solid reliable by now. I discovered to my chagrin that swapping polarity on a Pertronix toasts it--unless you buy the "new and improved" o; /html/fot/2004-09/msg00086.html (10,870 bytes)
3. RE: Rev limiter revisited-Pertronix (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:10:18 -0700; I think you're assuming that the design has been updated in the last 30 years ... Well, first you have to decide that you have a problem, then you have to decide that it's worth fixing a product wit; /html/fot/2004-09/msg00088.html (8,613 bytes)
4. RE: Rev limiter revisited-Pertronix (score: 1): Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 00:58:22 GMT; The Pertronix part that I had mounted completely in the distributor. with 2 wires coming out. One wire to the poitive of the coil and the other to the neg. Magnets slip over the ditributor cam lobes; /html/fot/2004-09/msg00093.html (9,231 bytes)
5. RE: Rev limiter revisited-Pertronix (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <Ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:44:16 -0700; Right. That's the piece that I'm talking about, with a power transistor inside it, mounted to the engine (via the distributor). Lots of people seem to like them, so no doubt they're nowhere near as; /html/fot/2004-09/msg00094.html (7,636 bytes)
6. RE: Rev limiter revisited-Pertronix (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:49:44 -0700; It's kind of Ironic--when the car was running lousy I got two second place finishes. Once we got the miss fixed, Cameron Healey's Pooper was back in action and I got relegated to two third place fini; /html/fot/2004-09/msg00095.html (11,400 bytes)
7. RE: Rev limiter revisited-Pertronix (score: 1): Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:08:32 GMT; No I did not. I got in a hurry and did only that one pull with the MSD to see how it compared. Joe(B) -- I wonder, for those who have compared points to MSD on the dyno ... did you try making any pul; /html/fot/2004-09/msg00101.html (7,647 bytes)
8. Re: Rev limiter revisited-Pertronix (score: 1): Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:37:04 -0700; I felt good doing 1:41 and felt there is more in my car. I think I understand what you're saying about turn 4, I do brake and head for an apex which I can't find. When I went on to the racetrack for; /html/fot/2004-09/msg00102.html (9,053 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]