Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Riding\s+high\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Riding\s+high\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Riding high (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 10:30:02 -0700; Can anyone advise me as to the correct height for a 1970 MGB GT with Rover V8 dropped in. Haynes does not give it and my Brooklands shows 23.5inches but it is difficult to see to where! - it also say; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00197.html (7,663 bytes)
2. Re: Riding high (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 13:31:23 -0700; How can there be a "correct" height for a non-original specification? You're just going to have to make up your own mind about what you like, or what you can live with. -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00207.html (8,186 bytes)
3. RE: Riding high (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 15:54:32 -0600; Max I would be inclined to agree; but, how about in 1973? I would guess that Barrie's 1970 would be the same as the 1973-76 MGB GT V8. However, the V8 and the 4 cylinder cars I'm pretty certain sit; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00210.html (7,614 bytes)
4. Re: Riding high (score: 1): Author: <ptegler@cablespeed.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:16:06 -0400; didn't Paul Hunt post the response to the survey on this subject on his web site? A bunch of us all chatted about this when the crapo batch of springs were the common supplier source, and seemed a lo; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00214.html (8,352 bytes)
5. RE: Riding high (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 21:53:43 -0600; Yeah, I'm sure all the ride heights are on Paul Hunt's site. Larry Hoy /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00215.html (8,054 bytes)
6. Re: Riding high (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 09:01:11 -0700; As the Rover set up is very very near the weight of the 1.8 iron block it makes sense to have the machine configured as it was when it had the original motor. Unfortunately for me the 1970 was bough; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00220.html (8,876 bytes)
7. Re: Riding high (score: 1): Author: Larry Colen <lrcar@red4est.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 11:19:18 -0700; Ride height is based on suspesnsion geometry, not engine size. I don't believe that there is any difference in the mounting points, a-arms or shocks on stock chrome bumper MGBs. There are various th; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00222.html (9,621 bytes)
8. Re: Riding high (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 14:16:24 -0700; Hmmm, I was thinking V8s started in 1974 with the other body modifications... factory V8s are essentially similar to RBs, not CBs. -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it'; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00225.html (7,909 bytes)
9. RE: Riding high (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:12:54 -0600; 1973-1976 MGB GT V8s were all chrome bumper cars. Just like Barries. http://www.mgcars.org.uk/mgb.html#MGBGTV8 Larry Hoy /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.te; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00230.html (7,756 bytes)
10. RE: Riding high (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:47:46 -0700; Sorry to come into the fray late. Max is correct, as far as I have been able to fathom out. If someone has real evidence that the following is incorrect, please let me know. This is my understanding:; /html/mgs/2003-06/msg00297.html (9,310 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]