- 1. RE: Roadster vs Convertible terminology (long) (score: 1)
- Author: Phil Vanner <pvanner@pclink.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:07:11 -0600
- Well here's my take on all this. Steve's definition is the one currently used by people trying to sell cars to the US. As car makers blend styles and functionality and marketers use what ever word th
- /html/spridgets/1999-01/msg00725.html (15,723 bytes)
- 2. Re: Roadster vs Convertible terminology (long) (score: 1)
- Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:15:54 -0500
- My .02 cents on terminology. GT like in MGB-GT would be wrong as I was tought. GT originally meant "Grand Touring" and Grand Touring refered to a 4 door convertable. A grand (big) car meant for touri
- /html/spridgets/1999-01/msg00737.html (9,177 bytes)
- 3. RE: Roadster vs Convertible terminology (long) (score: 1)
- Author: Peter C <nosimport@mailbag.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:18:41 -0800
-
- /html/spridgets/1999-01/msg00745.html (8,304 bytes)
- 4. RE: Roadster vs Convertible terminology (long) (score: 1)
- Author: Phil Vanner <pvanner@pclink.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:26:15 -0600
- Hmm. Good point. Is it a folding top over the passengers = Phaeton as opposed to fixed top over the passengers = coupe? I'm not certain if the coupe definition in 1 is applicable to automobiles, it j
- /html/spridgets/1999-01/msg00750.html (8,379 bytes)
- 5. Re: Roadster vs Convertible terminology (long) (score: 1)
- Author: Rick/Carolyn <walters@mail.softcom.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 07:28:01 -0800
- Hi Phil, After reading your post I have come to the conclusion Jaguar blew it when they came up with their xj12c Coupe in the 70's. It's got more leg room in the back seat then most US cars and no co
- /html/spridgets/1999-01/msg00777.html (18,558 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu