To all that might be interested... It's been over 24 hrs... Not a word although 178 previous e-mails on the subject not counting the ones i wrote.... Not even a public show of hands from people here
Dave I really don't have a dog in this fight... But I would like to see some of the questions you posed answered.... Like how do I change a Rule? What are the Procedures? Who do I contact? What do I
We went through some rule changing threads early last year. Seems like Dan Warner was the man to get things done. I don't know if that's his real job, or if he just ended up carrying the ball, but he
Being a newbie, I'm interested too ... even if it doesn't me directly (this Dale i am with you keith and dave. _________________________________________________________________
I believe that I have weighed in on this subject already. But I think Dave would like a final show of hands. So here goes again. Basically I have thought the x3 factor for rotary engines is excessive
My hand is up in support of this too. I think if all other organizations accept the 2:1 ratio, then SCTA (we) should do the same. Dick J -- John Beckett <landspeedracer@email.msn.com> wrote: == * * *
Current 500 cc GP motorcycles produce almost 200 HP (!). I don't know if any direct comparisons can be made, but clearly a rotary shouldn't be penalized MORE than 2 strokes. Shouldn't we be in line w
I agree with Keith that your suggestion needs thorough consideration bt the Rules Committee, and if they decline to act on the proposal they should reply to you and the LSR community as to what thei
Keith & list, Of course you have a vote! Now with the internet more than ever. We have covered this before but, for the new people here we go. There is available at each SCTA/BNI/USFRA meet a Rule Ch
I know this is a mistake but, As I remember it the logic for the X3 for rotaries is that they have 3 chambers that roughly relate to cylinders in a reciprocating engine. Each chamber fires once on on
THAT MAY BE THE YOUR LOGIC BUT IT S A MYTH.....IT IS NOT THE WAY THE ENGINE WORKS PERIOD! PLEASE READ MOST OF THE PREVIOUS POSTS I SENT ON HOW THIS THING WORKS THERE OUGHT TO BE ABOUT 50 OF THEM... D
Dave; You are ignoring what I said. I said it fires all 3 chambers in one full revolution of the ROTOR. I am not relating displacement to crankshaft revolutions in this discussion. In no other place
well i read it and did not think about it the way you did. the reason i didn't is that it does have a crank throw and there is no transmission betwen the crank throw and output shaft they are all one
Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 18:12:42 -0800
Guys, let us face the facts. There really isn't any way to come up with a "factor" that will be viewed as fair by all concerned. Someone has suggested a separate class for the rotary engine and that
Hey, I'm out here, and VERY interested. Just been really busy, and haven't checked mail lately. Let me catch up with all these massages and see what's going on. So much for getting a little extra sl
Okay, for those who may not know, I'm one of the 1% (or so I'm told) of list members who actually prefers Wankel rotary power. Been building these things since the early 80's. I'm not an engineer, a