Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SUVs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SUVs\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. SUVs (score: 1): Author: lmg@gomog.com; Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 15:03:40 -0500; Hi Jeff, You are quite right..noramlly a four wheel drive has no greater braking ability than any other car on ice or snow. However, outside the urban areas here, we are permitted to use carbide met; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00001.html (6,833 bytes)
2. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: Marv Coulthard <coulthard@saltspring.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 21:37:40 -0800; ahhhhh but here on the west coast of Canada... we had a sunny day... +10C... so took Morgan for a spin... spent 3 hrs on the road taking all the guests here for a ride. An awsome new years day. Hope; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00002.html (6,887 bytes)
3. SUVs (score: 1): Author: lmg@gomog.com; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:43:40 -0500; Hi Chuck and Tony, I too have never understood this infatuation with SUVs you both complain about. Frankly, during the winter, there is not much difference between an SUV with all season tires and a; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00102.html (7,281 bytes)
4. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: lmg@gomog.com; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:54:44 -0500; Tony and Chuck, Thanks for the graciousness of your replies. From my side, your fine reps here precede you and I was not offended at your SUV comments and simply wanted to show another prespective. Y; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00106.html (7,072 bytes)
5. RE: SUVs (score: 1): Author: "DeLuca, Joseph" <Joseph.DeLuca@pfizer.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:04:00 -0500; Has anyone ever converted a Morgan to 4-wheel drive? I remember there were numerous Fergusen conversions way back when. Maybe with big knobby tires. Then we could look forward to "War of the Roses, P; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00135.html (6,833 bytes)
6. RE: SUVs (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:53:11 -0500; I can't speak for Tony, who will most likely reply as well. SUVs make a handy target so it's hard not to throw snowballs at them. ;-) Much, if not all, that I wrote about SUVs was written with tongu; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00136.html (8,098 bytes)
7. SUVs (score: 1): Author: <Ross.Stein@kp.org> ("cpyrt M0899"); Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 16:53:00 -0800; I suppose SUVs have legitimate uses (as they did before the current madness) so here's a proposal. Simply present your Contractor's License, Farm Deed, or other such proof of need and you can buy an; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00096.html (7,504 bytes)
8. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: CHarris990@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 21:50:01 EST; << I suppose SUVs have legitimate uses (as they did before the current madness) so here's a proposal. Simply present your Contractor's License, Farm Deed, or other such proof of need and you can buy; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00098.html (7,780 bytes)
9. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: ARoman4047@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 22:09:05 EST; What exactly constitutes a "girls (sic) vehicle"? Or is this a take off on the Mitsubishi ad in the gym..."the beige minivan with its lights on in the parking lot" ? Tony in NJ ...Type 2 with 914 and; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00099.html (7,445 bytes)
10. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: smithmog@ix.netcom.com; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 20:50:18 -0000; Harris-Easy there, buckaroo. Your comment is redolent of "...real men don't drive minivans," when in fact we all know that real men drive whatever they want. I'll concede minivans don't have the mach; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00100.html (8,423 bytes)
11. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: CHarris990@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 23:46:11 EST; << I'll concede minivans don't have the macho 'can-do' appeal of, say, an Isetta 300... -Smith >> Jeff, You have to be tough to dress and drive things like I do. Some folks I know even drive Chrysler; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00101.html (7,772 bytes)
12. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: "Ernest(Chip) Brown" <Chip.Brown@msdw.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:06:17 -0500; You'd better include Morgan racers in that group, big guy. And if you insist we pay a gas guzzler tax, some of us will be driven off the race track. Is that also what you want??? Aren't SUVs really a; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00103.html (7,746 bytes)
13. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: ARoman4047@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:21:58 EST; ...Those land yachts are OK as long as they're flyin' ...It's the braking that worries me when I see one in my VW Type 2 rear view mirror... Tony in NJ (W.A.S.T.E.); /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00105.html (7,330 bytes)
14. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <dibiase@home.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:41:43 -0500; Good point, Chip - although somehow I don't see people 25 years from now, drooling over a 2000 Lincoln Navigator or Chevy Suburban! At least not like I do over a Morgan or MG! Or even a late-fifties; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00106.html (7,419 bytes)
15. RE: SUVs (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:57:04 -0500; "I suppose SUVs have legitimate uses (as they did before the current madness) so here's a proposal. Simply present your Contractor's License, Farm Deed, or other such proof of need and you can buy a; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00107.html (8,216 bytes)
16. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: "Ernest(Chip) Brown" <Chip.Brown@msdw.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:27:22 -0500; Well, that's why I bought the Toyota and a trailer with brakes. But I have to tell you, people think nothing of pulling right in front of you in the right hand lane, because they're in too much of a; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00108.html (7,869 bytes)
17. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: "Ernest(Chip) Brown" <Chip.Brown@msdw.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:36:50 -0500; Don't be too sure. Old pickups are well-loved today. I intend to keep my Toyota until either it or I become a collector's item. cb; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00110.html (7,372 bytes)
18. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: CHarris990@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:01:00 EST; Very good. The next politically correct left wing extremist program could be to get the impractical vehicles, particularly those that can neither be used in carpooling or not traceable by satellite,; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00114.html (7,938 bytes)
19. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: "Kit Hildreth" <kithildreth@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 17:30:41 GMT; "I suppose SUVs have legitimate uses .....Get a minivan, please." ** What's the difference? Apart from the pretension to "Sport" in the former, none as far as I can see. Kit Hildreth '77 Plus 8 (pini; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00119.html (7,500 bytes)
20. Re: SUVs (score: 1): Author: "Kit Hildreth" <kithildreth@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 17:49:30 GMT; Chip Brown" ** For "canoe" read BARGE! Kit; /html/morgans/2000-03/msg00120.html (7,225 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]