Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spring\s+sizes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spring\s+sizes\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: "wizardz" <wizardz@maxinter.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:57:28 -0400; OK.... we've got AHH6451 listed for a 62-72 B roadster BHH1225 listed for a '73-80 roadster and the 74 1/2 GT BHH1077 listed for the 66-74 GT. I guess my Q is ... what's the real weight difference an; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00831.html (7,790 bytes)
2. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: paul.hunt1@virgin.net; Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:06:00 +0100; What on? There were more variations than that over the years, Clausager mentions 5 different front springs, although one of those may only have been a number change. You might like to have a look at; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00840.html (8,959 bytes)
3. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 18:52:44 -0500; Have been waiting 'til I got done with my front end rebuild before answering your post about front springs. I rebuilt my '69 B's front end on a different crossmember because the one on the car was da; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00960.html (8,160 bytes)
4. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: David Deutsch <mgman@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:25:49 -0400; I COULD tell you how to fix that there front end problem but I don't have an engineering degree (one semester more and I would have) and I'm not going to try and find documentation for you either. Yo; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00965.html (8,876 bytes)
5. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: "Craig D. Niederst" <niederst@telerama.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 22:41:58 -0400; Same deal with my '71 B. Used the same Moss 264-375 "stock" sized springs for pre-'74 B's. But my B is at the same height it was before the front suspension rebuild, where the springs appeared to be; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00969.html (9,191 bytes)
6. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 22:58:56 -0500; I got a msg from a Moss guy tonight. He sez I should try the RBB springs to raise the front. I know he means well but he's forgotten our private Email exchanges, some months ago, in which he told me; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00973.html (7,607 bytes)
7. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 22:44:46 -0500; I am more than happy to listen to anyone who has actually done something I'd like to know about, successfully or not. Negative data is data too. If someone told me that they'd used such-and-so sprin; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00974.html (7,940 bytes)
8. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: Chris Attias <cattias@cats.ucsc.edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:23:39 -0700; The world of British reproduction (or even new) springs is not all that precise. A lot akin to blacksmithing in my experience. I looked at a lot of period road test photos to figure out correct ride; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01004.html (8,307 bytes)
9. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:13:29 -0500; Someone has a list of ride heights, from a survey of various owners, on their website. I can't remember where it is. CR; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01027.html (7,237 bytes)
10. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 19:42:39 +0100; I replaced old CB roadster front springs with new RB roadsters. The new springs had a much shorter free height but gave alomost the same ride height. Much less roll and dive though, although probably; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01059.html (8,210 bytes)
11. Re: Spring sizes (score: 1): Author: <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 19:43:29 +0100; http://www.mgb-stuff.org.uk 'Spanners' and 'Ride Height'; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01062.html (7,612 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]