Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stainless\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Stainless (score: 1)
Author: "Nils O. Ny" <n.ny@intest.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 12:26:29 -0400
Stainless is a wonderful material when it comes to corrosion .... but don't forget that it is much weaker than the normal hardened steel studs. Regards, Nils
/html/shop-talk/1998-05/msg00026.html (7,427 bytes)

2. Re: Stainless (score: 1)
Author: Heather & Joe Way <sierrasa@psln.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 13:50:29 -0700
Very important point Nils makes here--most stainless fasteners aren't nearly as strong as grade 5 fasteners. Look good, break fast. Fine on rocker cover bolts and such, but don't use them anywhere th
/html/shop-talk/1998-05/msg00031.html (8,053 bytes)

3. Re: Stainless (score: 1)
Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 17:31:22 -0400
Just how weak is weak? My seat rails are bolted to the floot with stainless. Should I be concerned? -- Trevor Boicey, Ottawa, Canada. tboicey@brit.ca, http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/ [ Seeking some misc
/html/shop-talk/1998-05/msg00033.html (7,485 bytes)

4. Re: Stainless (score: 1)
Author: "Nils O. Ny" <n.ny@intest.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 18:19:08 -0400
Personally I would go with grade 9 bolts for those that are going to help hold me in place when I finally hit an immovable object .... but then again the stainless are probably OK. Depends on your pr
/html/shop-talk/1998-05/msg00034.html (7,301 bytes)

5. Re: Stainless (score: 1)
Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 18:39:55 -0400
Well, technically thost bolts don't really hold you in. The seatbelts are what hold you in, those bolts really just hold the seat down. It would be nice obviously to keep the seat in place during a c
/html/shop-talk/1998-05/msg00036.html (7,543 bytes)

6. Re: Stainless (score: 1)
Author: "Nils O. Ny" <n.ny@intest.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 12:38:02 -0400
Damn .... I knew as soon as I hit the send button someone was going to catch me on that technicality. Sorry!
/html/shop-talk/1998-05/msg00038.html (7,316 bytes)

7. Re: Stainless (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Sullivan <kevins@khoral.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 15:10:06 -0600 (MDT)
In some driving situations, it almost seems that the seatbelts aren't necessary to keep one attached to the seat. :) Kevin Sullivan kevins@khoral.com Khoral Research Inc. www.khoral.com/staff/kevins/
/html/shop-talk/1998-05/msg00041.html (7,788 bytes)

8. FW: Stainless (score: 1)
Author: "Gerald Brazil" <gerrybraz@voyager.net>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 18:15:42 -0400
Kevin, out west we refer to that as, "pinchin' the saddle" GJB --Original Message-- From: shop-talk-owner@autox.team.net [mailto:shop-talk-owner@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan Sent: Wedn
/html/shop-talk/1998-05/msg00042.html (8,169 bytes)

9. Re: Stainless (score: 1)
Author: Bob Moore <mustang@best.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 15:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Like if you get rear-ended you could shear the seat bolts? -bob
/html/shop-talk/1998-05/msg00043.html (7,100 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu