Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Summit\s+Point\s+Zoning\s+Woes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Summit\s+Point\s+Zoning\s+Woes\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: Mactds@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 21:04:29 EST; Hello All, I just received an email attachment from a fellow flagger friend who participates a great deal @ Summit Point. Apparently our fellow racer & track owner, Bill Scott, is coming up against a; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00084.html (7,902 bytes)
2. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: Calvin Krug <ckrug@laf.cioe.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:03:11 -0500; I will never figure out how someone can move in next to a race track, and THEN complain about the noise. If the track was there first, it has seniority, and if they don't like the noise, I'll be hap; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00089.html (8,717 bytes)
3. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: Stan Hanks <stan@networkmercenaries.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 21:00:15 -0800; Don't tell me that these fine citizens didn't realize that they were buying property within earshot of a major racing facility... Sheesh. What we need is some really good lawyers that happen to be r; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00091.html (8,007 bytes)
4. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 07:26:15 -0600; Blackhawk Farms, in Rockton, Illinois went through a similar fight that lasted several years. One tactic that the owner used was to ask race participants to send a letter to the county zoning board e; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00092.html (9,432 bytes)
5. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 07:28:18 -0600; Here in the Midwest, there are fairly frequent problems with subdivisions springing up within smelling distance of farms that have been in families for over 100 years. People are funny. Maybe we shou; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00094.html (9,597 bytes)
6. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: Joseph_Chimbolo@hyperion.com; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:38:34 -0500; I strongly suggest taking a different approach and attitude regarding the community and the "track" Get the community involved in the Summit Point track. Running races, Bicycle races. Community fairs; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00098.html (9,623 bytes)
7. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: "Susan" <alfasun@esslink.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:48:38 -0500; Cool, but I can't practice in WVA (C.A.R.E.) on terrorist buying; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00099.html (9,032 bytes)
8. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: "Bryan Appleby" <bappleby@concentric.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 07:56:48 -0700; The group is calling themselves Citizens Against Raceway Expansion (C.A.R.E.) Under their proposals use of the track would be restricted to 9am - 5pm on Mondays-Saturdays and from noon-5pm on Sundays; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00100.html (11,184 bytes)
9. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: "Roger Sieling" <Rogsie@telesistech.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 10:39:23 -0500; Ever been to the Blue/Grey SVRA race and seen the Civil war encampment and re-enactments or the tractor shows etc that run concurent. I'll agree that teen driver ed might be a good step, but these sa; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00101.html (11,027 bytes)
10. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: S800Racer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 10:42:04 EST; << a local group who wish to limit his activities at the track. >> "local group"? they'll have to include cattle to get their membership over a few dozen. All joking aside, if any group is acting to; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00102.html (8,621 bytes)
11. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: LMR356@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 10:57:03 EST; Baltimore/Washington area agzillion times over the past 15 years....it is evident that the local Charlestown/Summit Point landscape in now becoming dotted with new homes and developments. Many famili; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00103.html (11,465 bytes)
12. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: S800Racer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 10:59:51 EST; << This is where we as racers can become more organized, by lists like this. Letter writing from all of us >> OK, the game plan should be: 1) Track (Bill Scott) should be contacted by someone who can; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00104.html (9,142 bytes)
13. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: Tombread@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:16:53 EST; Doesn't Lime Rock, like many tracks, have a Sunday morning "no engines" rule? Some years ago when I was employed by Indianapolis Raceway Park, I came across a legislative proposition that said all ca; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00105.html (9,734 bytes)
14. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: "Bryan Appleby" <bappleby@concentric.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:32:57 -0700; You are absolutely right, Lee. One more thing is, many of these decisions are made at the County level. Not just "next door homeowners." So what is the consideration of the general populace for the e; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00106.html (9,970 bytes)
15. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: "Nick England" <nick@3rdtech.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:39:41 -0500; I think track owner Bob Scott has always been a pretty good citizen of the area - and his trackside apple orchards and associated processing plant bring jobs and income to the county. Also the lunch-; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00107.html (9,083 bytes)
16. RE: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: Jim Hill <Jim_Hill@chsra.wisc.edu>; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 10:42:18 -0600; All true. Remember that your allies in the fight against "these idiots" include everyone who wants to preserve the "open space" that a race track provides (as opposed to even more urban sprawl), plus; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00108.html (9,421 bytes)
17. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: "Roger Sieling" <Rogsie@telesistech.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 12:01:17 -0500; This issue reminds me that we are also under attach at Roebling Road, although to a much lesser degree. There are those new houses built outside turn 1 who have started to complain and have added a n; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00111.html (12,179 bytes)
18. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: Tombread@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:06:57 EST; If I were the folks at SP I would have at least one neighbors' day each year and get the locals into race cars...have a barbecue and invite drivers...give them tickets...have a special paddock area..; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00112.html (10,597 bytes)
19. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: "Roger Sieling" <Rogsie@telesistech.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 11:47:48 -0500; Maybe it's the fruit picker's union. << a local group who wish to limit his activities at the track. >> "local group"? they'll have to include cattle to get their membership over a few dozen. All jok; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00113.html (9,073 bytes)
20. Re: Summit Point Zoning Woes (score: 1): Author: Joseph_Chimbolo@hyperion.com; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:52:38 -0500; As in my earlier message, I agree with Tom. If people do want to argue the issue, they may unleash a community activist with nothing in their day to do but attack SP. I could see the concern about ra; /html/vintage-race/2000-12/msg00114.html (10,644 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]