Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Swaybars\s+and\s+Lifters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Swaybars\s+and\s+Lifters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Swaybars and Lifters (score: 1): Author: Chuck Arnold <Chuck.Arnold@oracle.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:16:07 -0800; Mike, I would like a picture or two, and also how these might be ordered. On your lifter question: PRI Racing offers lightened and hardened cam followers. Expensive, but so are god cams. http://www.p; /html/fot/2003-03/msg00295.html (8,550 bytes)
2. Re: Swaybars and Lifters (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:23:35 -0500; Interesting that the PRI page implies that all Spitfires used the same cam follower...which they don't. The early 1147 engines, through the better part of the run of the Mk2 model, used a different (; /html/fot/2003-03/msg00297.html (6,928 bytes)
3. Re: Swaybars and Lifters (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <Spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:31:28 -0700; And to add to that, if you have one of those engines, you probably won't be adding any high lift cams without having the channels re-bored to accept the larger followers. Joe; /html/fot/2003-03/msg00299.html (7,185 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]