Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Swingspring\s+fix\?\s+sort\s+of\s+long\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Swingspring\s+fix\?\s+sort\s+of\s+long\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Swingspring fix? sort of long (score: 1): Author: FODFARTS@cs.com; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:40:56 EDT; This subject seems to elicit quite strong opinions from the list and I'm not sure why, but here goes. I have a 64 Spitfire with a completely stock rear suspension, yes the dreaded swing axles are sti; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg01075.html (8,403 bytes)
2. Re: Swingspring fix? sort of long (score: 1): Author: Richard B Gosling <Gosling_Richard_B@perkins.com>; Date: 29 Jun 2000 06:13:39 -0500; Don't know if anyone has fitted a GT6 engine to an MGB or GT, but MG themselves did something similar - they fitted a 3-litre straight 6, and called it the MGC and MGCGT. The engine was similar to t; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg01122.html (8,382 bytes)
3. Re: Swingspring fix? sort of long (score: 1): Author: "wizardz" <wizardz@maxinter.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:06:42 -0400; I own multiples of both! Neither the MG or Triumph have any 'all encompassing' advantage over the other. They're all a blast. Paul Tegler wizardz@toad.net http://www.teglerizer.com (new layout) Brad,; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg01128.html (8,811 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]