Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+3a\s+vs\s+4A\s+clutch\s+stuff\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 08:31:17 -0400
I will be mating a TR4A gearbox to my TR3a engine. I have the flywheel, friction disc, clutch, and throwout bearings from both. I know this has gone around before but it didn't stick to me since I wa
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00686.html (7,725 bytes)

2. Re: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:56:53 -0400
Actually I have both flywheels too so that wouldn't be an issue but at this point since it will be street driven and I have a new TR3 friction disc, I will stay with the TR3 setup. So I will then mov
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00693.html (9,738 bytes)

3. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:50:44 -0700
While it's always dangerous to disagree with Jack, I feel the earlier clutch is better made and more bulletproof. And the extra surface area should mean it lasts longer, although I've never had to t
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00697.html (8,175 bytes)

4. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:26:06 -0500
Oh, I dunno. I could just say the same thing I say to my wife when she disagrees, which is "Yes, Dear" uncle jack Check out the new British Cars Forum: http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-view_forum.
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00703.html (7,758 bytes)

5. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 07:42:42 -0500
Please be aware that although both clutches perform well when used for normal driving, NO ONE in racing uses the finger-type clutche. EVERYONE uses the diaphragm type clutch, because the finger type
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00707.html (8,545 bytes)

6. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:22:37 -0700
See ? I told you it was dangerous to disagree with Jack ! But I've driven some 300,000 miles with the 3A clutch, generally shifting around 5500 rpm and doing some fairly lengthy runs (hours) at over
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00719.html (8,205 bytes)

7. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:36:59 -0700
Thought I did have it committed to memory but that didn't sound right, so I've got one in my hands (signed by Kas no less). Page 22 talks about modifying the combustion chambers, nothing about clutc
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00722.html (8,407 bytes)

8. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:51:06 -0500
Randall, Randall, Randall. Take two deep breaths and step away from your computer. My original response to Mr Wallace was, "The life of the finger clutch and the diaphragm clutch is about the same wh
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00727.html (8,419 bytes)

9. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:55:10 -0700
No quarrel at all ... I just feel that the TR3 clutch lasts longer and is less prone to problems on the street than the 4A clutch. TR6 in particular seem to have a lot of problems with the same diap
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00729.html (10,214 bytes)

10. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:21:14 -0700
I love your sense of humor!! To say nothing of your knowledge and willingness to contribute to us all so much! Jim No quarrel at all ... I just feel that the TR3 clutch lasts longer and is less pron
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg00731.html (10,722 bytes)

11. TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jim Wallace <wallaces@superaje.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 08:31:17 -0400
I will be mating a TR4A gearbox to my TR3a engine. I have the flywheel, friction disc, clutch, and throwout bearings from both. I know this has gone around before but it didn't stick to me since I wa
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01472.html (8,195 bytes)

12. Re: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jim Wallace <wallaces@superaje.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:56:53 -0400
Actually I have both flywheels too so that wouldn't be an issue but at this point since it will be street driven and I have a new TR3 friction disc, I will stay with the TR3 setup. So I will then mov
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01479.html (10,427 bytes)

13. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:50:44 -0700
While it's always dangerous to disagree with Jack, I feel the earlier clutch is better made and more bulletproof. And the extra surface area should mean it lasts longer, although I've never had to t
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01483.html (9,072 bytes)

14. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:26:06 -0500
Oh, I dunno. I could just say the same thing I say to my wife when she disagrees, which is "Yes, Dear" uncle jack Check out the new British Cars Forum: http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-view_forum.
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01489.html (8,851 bytes)

15. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 07:42:42 -0500
Please be aware that although both clutches perform well when used for normal driving, NO ONE in racing uses the finger-type clutche. EVERYONE uses the diaphragm type clutch, because the finger type
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01493.html (9,857 bytes)

16. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:22:37 -0700
See ? I told you it was dangerous to disagree with Jack ! But I've driven some 300,000 miles with the 3A clutch, generally shifting around 5500 rpm and doing some fairly lengthy runs (hours) at over
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01505.html (9,475 bytes)

17. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:36:59 -0700
Thought I did have it committed to memory but that didn't sound right, so I've got one in my hands (signed by Kas no less). Page 22 talks about modifying the combustion chambers, nothing about clutc
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01508.html (9,466 bytes)

18. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:51:06 -0500
Randall, Randall, Randall. Take two deep breaths and step away from your computer. My original response to Mr Wallace was, "The life of the finger clutch and the diaphragm clutch is about the same wh
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01513.html (9,276 bytes)

19. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:55:10 -0700
No quarrel at all ... I just feel that the TR3 clutch lasts longer and is less prone to problems on the street than the 4A clutch. TR6 in particular seem to have a lot of problems with the same diap
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01515.html (10,871 bytes)

20. RE: TR 3a vs 4A clutch stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Bauder" <jimbpps@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:21:14 -0700
I love your sense of humor!! To say nothing of your knowledge and willingness to contribute to us all so much! Jim No quarrel at all ... I just feel that the TR3 clutch lasts longer and is less pron
/html/triumphs/2004-08/msg01517.html (11,138 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu