Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+e\-mail\s+responses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+e\-mail\s+responses\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: TR e-mail responses (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 10:41:02 -0500; I received many replies to my recent post suggesting prefixing post subjects with a standard prefix. All of them recommended updating my mail reader. I am in the process of doing so. I would like mak; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00106.html (6,976 bytes)
2. RE: TR e-mail responses (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 12:46:11 -0500 (EST); The standardized prefixes you sometimes see on the subject lines of mailing list messages are usually added by the mailing list software (Majordomo in the case of the autox.team.net lists), not by th; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00117.html (8,190 bytes)
3. Re: TR e-mail responses (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 15:30:50 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"; I support Peter's request to Isolate, and be more definitive about subject Yes, if you have the correct mail software you can do something's others cannot do. It is not right to expect everybody to b; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00122.html (7,628 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]