Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR4\/6\s+Master\s+Cylinder\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR4\/6\s+Master\s+Cylinder\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. TR4/6 Master Cylinder (score: 1): Author: "JLEE" <jlee-cc@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:24:06 -0600; I'm sure this has been talked about in the past, but I was wondering if a TR6 dual master cylinder setup will work on a TR4 without modifications other than plumbing? I need to make a change for my V; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00175.html (7,546 bytes)
2. Re: TR4/6 Master Cylinder (score: 1): Author: WEmery7451@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:46:32 EST; << I'm sure this has been talked about in the past, but I was wondering if a TR6 dual master cylinder setup will work on a TR4 without modifications other than plumbing?; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00177.html (7,588 bytes)
3. Re: TR4/6 Master Cylinder (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:01:31 EST; I agree with you! I, too, am not convinced it is safer. I had the brakes fail on a 1980s Chevrolet 3/4 Ton Van, and it had a dual brake system. I had no brakes. My salvation was STANDING on the emerg; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00178.html (8,174 bytes)
4. Re: TR4/6 Master Cylinder (score: 1): Author: "Richard Taylor" <n196x@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:55:22 -0500; After fooling around (mostly unsuccessfully) with home-spun bias bars on two m/c's, I put on a TR-6 dual m/c with a power boost system. It wasn't exactly a bolt-in arrangement, but it also wasn't te; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00179.html (8,562 bytes)
5. Re: TR4/6 Master Cylinder (score: 1): Author: WEmery7451@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 18:26:20 EST; << I agree with you! I, too, am not convinced it is safer. I had the brakes fail on a 1980s Chevrolet 3/4 Ton Van, and it had a dual brake system. I had no brakes. My salvation was STANDING on the em; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00181.html (7,820 bytes)
6. Re: TR4/6 Master Cylinder (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 21:36:39 EST; <<I agree with you! I, too, am not convinced it is safer. I had the brakes fail on a 1980s Chevrolet 3/4 Ton Van, and it had a dual brake system. I had no brakes. My salvation was STANDING on the eme; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00183.html (8,705 bytes)
7. Re: TR4/6 Master Cylinder (score: 1): Author: "John Kipping" <johnkipping@inet.net.nz>; Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 08:29:16 +1300; Let me just check we have some facts right, here we have two people in the US on one yahoo group who have had rusted brake lines fail, and presumably you both know about car maintenance and what to d; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00192.html (9,969 bytes)
8. RE: TR4/6 Master Cylinder (score: 1): Author: "Susan and Jack Brooks" <tr3a@att.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:24:07 -0800; Insurance will pay either way. Many states, my current Washington state included, have no annual safety inspection, only an emissions inspection every other year. In my eyes, an annual or every othe; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00193.html (11,226 bytes)
9. RE: TR4/6 Master Cylinder (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 13:56:28 -0800; Nope, insurance works pretty much the same across the U.S.. Any teeth insurance had focused around fault has been well diluted by both economics and law. Cars are NOT maintained beyond oil changes, t; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00195.html (11,310 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]