Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR4\s+rocker\s+ratio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR4\s+rocker\s+ratio\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:50:15 -0600; This question was raised a couple weeks ago. I thought is was time for a technical discussion. A couple years ago I decide to measure the rocker ratio. Using a dial indicator and degree wheel, I meas; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00072.html (8,558 bytes)
2. RE: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:22:07 -0800; Very cool. Most of the things we think we know about mechanical stuff are really approximations based on static measurements. Not just for wildly dynamic stuff like rapidly moving gas columns, but ev; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00073.html (9,358 bytes)
3. Re: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:08:36 -0600; I would think that the ratio would change somewhat depending on what part of the rocker tip is contacting the valve. As the rocker depresses the valve, the place where it contacts the valve moves out; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00074.html (9,364 bytes)
4. Re: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:00:07 -0800; I don't think that is defection of the valve train due to spring pressure. I got 1.45: as a rocker ratio when I checked it years ago with light tension "checking " springs. The ratio will vary somewh; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00076.html (9,946 bytes)
5. Re: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:48:43 -0800; Might mention also on this ratio thing, if you rebush the rockers and then bore them off center you can improve the ratio and still have the stock units. It becomes better if you bore the rocker larg; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00077.html (10,718 bytes)
6. Re: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:55:01 -0600; Rocker contour makes a difference too, as does the length of the valve stems and height of rocker stands, because these both change the angle at which the rocker will be at midpoint of valve lift and; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00080.html (11,097 bytes)
7. RE: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:26:18 -0800; It might seem like I'm overly focused on this issue, but I'm getting ready to add roller rockers to Peyote, so I'm studying up on how to get the geometry just right. I did finally find somewhat of a; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00082.html (7,668 bytes)
8. RE: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:53:42 -0800; I'm really grumpy this evening. I went browsing in my library to see if any of my books had anything about valve train deflection and/or geometry variation over valve stroke (answer--nope), and I not; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00083.html (8,811 bytes)
9. RE: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:00:29 -0800; Actually, he's quite correct. I have two solutions for that--a ready-to-go set of standard rockers and a set of replacement tips for the rollers. The tips are fixed inserts that duplicate the ends of; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00084.html (8,958 bytes)
10. Re: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:22:55 -0600; Many of the geometric issues are addressed in http://home.swbell.net/cartrip/RockerGeom.pdf , which assumes you have a perfect arc at the valve end of the rocker arm and a perfect ball and socket at; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00085.html (9,274 bytes)
11. RE: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:47:56 -0800; When I was doing the clutch plumbing for my TR6, the tech guy at Earl's was insistent that I use AN-4 hose and larger ID steel pipe (than the brakes) for the clutch. I did and have had no problems.; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00086.html (7,964 bytes)
12. RE: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:25:48 -0800; Out of curiosity Kas, did you do anything to keep the rocker contact patch centered on the valve stem ? Randall; /html/fot/2005-01/msg00090.html (7,650 bytes)
13. TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: "Stutzman" <stutzman@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:03:52 -0500; what is the TR3/4 stock rocker ratio? I always thought it was 1.4 but I can't find it in the manuals. bruce stutzman; /html/fot/2004-12/msg00242.html (6,321 bytes)
14. Re: TR4 rocker ratio (score: 1): Author: EDWARD BARNARD <edwardbarnard@prodigy.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:54:43 -0800 (PST); My documentation is showing two different numbers for the stock ratio. One is 1.49/1 the other is 1.5/1. Hope that is some help. - Ed Stutzman <stutzman@adelphia.net> wrote:what is the TR3/4 stock ro; /html/fot/2004-12/msg00243.html (6,177 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]