Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\:\s+Camber\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\:\s+Camber\s+question\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. TR6: Camber question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:29:27 +1030; Hello all, I have an intriguing question (well I find it intriguing anyway). After I rebuilt the front suspension on my TR6 last year (I replaced the bushes, ball joints, tie rod ends, trunnions, spr; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00710.html (8,299 bytes)
2. Re: TR6: Camber question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:37:11 EST; Perhaps the old vertical link was bent, or perhaps the new one is defective somehow. Is it new or a "good" used one? I'd consider checking both against "spec"! Presuming that whichever link you end u; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00720.html (8,149 bytes)
3. TR6: Camber question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:38:21 -0500; Message text written by "Biedermann, Frank (SSABSA)" rebuilt the front suspension on my TR6 last year (I replaced the bushes, ball joints, tie rod ends, trunnions, spring seats/insulators - which wer; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00726.html (7,836 bytes)
4. Re: TR6: Camber question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:39:31 -0800; To expand on Dave Massey's comment, I would never expect alignment specs to stay the same after replacing all that stuff, especially with respect to the bushings. Simply replacing alignment shims ac; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00731.html (8,715 bytes)
5. RE: TR6: Camber question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 09:49:14 +1030; Thank you all for your comments - I guess I missed a few other important facts about the front suspension... I didn't touch the upper fulcrum pins (except to replace the bushings), and I'm almost 100; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00876.html (7,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]