- 1. RE: TR6 engine conversions (smog equipment) (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick & Lori" <trinitygadget@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 20:31:39 -0500
- Hugh hits all the buttons on the swap issue, especially the hot cats. What better reasons could there be to remain original? Rick O. 72 TR6 Wouldn't it be a good thing to keep the smog equipment on i
- /html/6pack/2004-02/msg00023.html (6,997 bytes)
- 2. Re: TR6 engine conversions (smog equipment) (score: 1)
- Author: BigOldWumper@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:56:01 EST
- Wouldn't it be a good thing to keep the smog equipment on if you were to swap to a more modern engine (especially if you have to by law anyway)? I know it might sap a couple horsepower, but I think t
- /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00482.html (8,976 bytes)
- 3. Re: TR6 engine conversions (smog equipment) (score: 1)
- Author: "steve bridge" <slbridge@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 23:48:48 +0000
- "From what I understand, old cars (i.e. pre-smog, '74 and earlier) make up 5% of all the cars on the road, but account for approximately half--50%--of all automobile pollution". The big power compani
- /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00483.html (8,277 bytes)
- 4. RE: TR6 engine conversions (smog equipment) (score: 1)
- Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:59:23 -0800
- Wouldn't it be a good thing to keep the smog equipment on if you were to to a more modern engine..... Its often not that simple. Where do you locate the exhaust cats under the car (hey make sure they
- /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00484.html (6,746 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu