Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\s+rear\s+tube\s+shock\s+conversion\s+\-\s+which\s+one\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\s+rear\s+tube\s+shock\s+conversion\s+\-\s+which\s+one\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TR6 rear tube shock conversion - which one? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:59:20 -0600 21, 2001) at 02/09/2002 10:59:23 AM, Serialize complete at 02/09/2002 10:59:23 AM, Itemize by SMTP Server on SMTPMTA2/i2Tech(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 02/09/200; What is the list's opinion on which is the best rear tube shock conversion available for street and occasional autocross performance (Rimmer Bros lists three different bracket types) and who is the b; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00385.html (7,621 bytes)
2. Re: TR6 rear tube shock conversion - which one? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:39:56 -0800 (PST); Hello Greg, My personal choice was the BPNW tube shock conversion, which is also offered through VB (though at a higher price) No holes to drill, no modifications to body or frame. NFI, YMMV, and all; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00492.html (8,084 bytes)
3. Re: TR6 rear tube shock conversion - which one? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:45:00 +0100; What is the list's opinion on which is the best rear tube shock conversion available for street and occasional autocross performance (Rimmer Bros lists three different bracket types) and who is the b; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00494.html (9,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]