Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR7\s+Conversion\s+to\s+V8\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR7\s+Conversion\s+to\s+V8\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: TR7 Conversion to V8 (score: 1): Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:37:37 -0800; FYI, Rover carb setup http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=42604&item=2445459053; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00008.html (9,509 bytes)
2. TR7 Conversion to V8 (score: 1): Author: Group44TR7@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 07:25:52 EST; Under California regulations, it is possible to upgrade a TR7 or TR8 street car (or for that matter any other post 1973 Triumph) to a newer engine. The only caveat is that the car is then subject to; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00238.html (7,850 bytes)
3. Re: TR7 Conversion to V8 (score: 1): Author: Dave Riddle <dave@microworks.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:30:10 -0700; It is Brother-in-law did it. His name is Dan Carrington and he lives in Simi Valley. His email address is dan@thecarringtons.net; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00243.html (8,433 bytes)
4. Re: TR7 Conversion to V8 (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 10:41:47 EST; Cary I don't have any address or telephone number, but there is a guy in Garland, Texas that runs a shop called 'John's Cars'. He is a Jaguar devote, who puts big Detroit engines in old Jags. I never; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00244.html (7,886 bytes)
5. Re: TR7 Conversion to V8 (score: 1): Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 07:50:36 -0800; As far as which Buick V8's are the same, I believe from 1963 to present(2003) all the 'Rover' motors are the same. That is a 2003 4.6 HSE with crank sensor will fill in a 1963 F-85. The motors went t; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00246.html (9,058 bytes)
6. Re: TR7 Conversion to V8 (score: 1): Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:17:45 -0800; My feeling is the carb engine. But if you want the PI, you have 2 ways to consider it, the simplest which would have probably been the earliest, or the most efficient, which would be the latest. We h; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00248.html (9,685 bytes)
7. RE: TR7 Conversion to V8 (score: 1): Author: "Susan and Jack Brooks" <tr3a@att.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:39:33 -0800; It's been done lot's of times. You need to join the wedge list. They will know everything you need to know. My understanding is that externally, the engines, all the way up to the most recent, share; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00250.html (9,590 bytes)
8. RE: TR7 Conversion to V8 (score: 1): Author: "Susan and Jack Brooks" <tr3a@att.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:36:15 -0800; It's been done lot's of times. You need to join the wedge list. My understanding is that externally the engines, all the way up to the most recent, share engine mount points, etc. The timing gear, w; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00251.html (9,349 bytes)
9. RE: TR7 Conversion to V8 (score: 1): Author: "Doug Mitchell" <dmitchel@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 17:45:57 -0500; Although all the aluminum V8s from Rover are the same, some of the reading I have done recently suggests that the later 4.2 and especially the 4.6s are not as good an engine as the earlier ones. This; /html/fot/2003-11/msg00252.html (9,843 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]