Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR8\s+Value\s+vs\s+Low\s+Production\s+Numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR8\s+Value\s+vs\s+Low\s+Production\s+Numbers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TR8 Value vs Low Production Numbers (score: 1): Author: Group44TR7@aol.com; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:20:23 EST; There is a very nice looking TR8 convertible on Ebay at the moment that is struggling to reach the $4,000 price. It is interesting that these cars which are really relatively rare (if everyone on the; /html/fot/2004-01/msg00141.html (6,829 bytes)
2. Re: TR8 Value vs Low Production Numbers (score: 1): Author: J M Wagner <jmwagner@greenheart.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:22:25 -0800; I briefly owned a TR8. One of the big negatives for me was the cost of some of the parts... not to mention availability of some of the uniquely TR8 parts... Next to that was just the fact that it was; /html/fot/2004-01/msg00142.html (8,471 bytes)
3. RE: TR8 Value vs Low Production Numbers (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:37:14 -0800; There's not much correlation between rarity and value. Desirability comes first, and then you add rarity--especially rarity caused by the item being expensive in the first place, though even that doe; /html/fot/2004-01/msg00144.html (9,109 bytes)
4. Re: TR8 Value vs Low Production Numbers (score: 1): Author: Group44TR7@aol.com; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:15:04 EST; I agree with your comment that value is based on the combination of both publicly perceived desirability as well as rarity. Personally, I do not put the TR8 is the category of cars that sucked, so I; /html/fot/2004-01/msg00169.html (8,098 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]