Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Theft\s+deterrent\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: "david hall" <dhhall@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:00:48 -0500
Have appreciated all the discussion re: foiling the actual theft of a Tiger. Most deterrents seem to be reasonably easy to foil, especially with a rollback towaway. It seems that the greatest chance
/html/tigers/2006-03/msg00134.html (7,614 bytes)

2. Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: Carmods@aol.com
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:13:39 EST
<<It seems that the greatest chance to keep your Tiger is not just to prevent its theft, but to track it down if it disappears>>. David, I think you have hit on a good idea. Maybe some of the people
/html/tigers/2006-03/msg00135.html (7,285 bytes)

3. RE: Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: "Stu Brennan" <stubrennan@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:29:03 -0500
In a modern car, there are electronic things and wiring all over the place, so another box with Lojack or some other tracking device, will blend right in. In our cars, where the entire schematic can
/html/tigers/2006-03/msg00136.html (7,322 bytes)

4. Re: Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 00:42:36 EST
In respect to the value of the car, the difficulty in replacing and the desirability of the Tiger to thieves make the cost of a Lojack system seem like a bargain. And just think of the hassle of deal
/html/tigers/2006-03/msg00155.html (7,015 bytes)

5. Re: Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: "csx2282@juno.com" <csx2282@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:21:16 GMT
No anti-theft system is a guarantee your car won't be stolen, or if it is that you'll get it back in the condition it was in when it was stolen. A case in point- a year or so a member of the local Sh
/html/tigers/2006-03/msg00190.html (7,500 bytes)

6. RE: Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: "Theo Smit" <theo.smit@dynastream.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:13:12 -0700
I think a large part of the value in installing a system like LoJack (and putting the damn decal on) is that it will cause some percentage of the wannabe crooks and joyriders to go look somewhere els
/html/tigers/2006-03/msg00191.html (7,270 bytes)

7. Re: Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: Paul Memont <prmnes@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:43:48 -0500
I came across this site. Of course even if this work as advertised the Tiger could still be put on a ramp truck and never be seen again. http://www.neverstolen.com/index.html Paul
/html/tigers/2006-03/msg00198.html (7,021 bytes)

8. Re: Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:12:46 -0800
Humm..... 3.5 million sold, 100,000 combinations. That means groups of 35 people all share the same code. I wouldn't doubt there is some thief out there that has a plug with LEDs or ability to read v
/html/tigers/2006-03/msg00199.html (7,169 bytes)

9. Theft Deterrent (score: 1)
Author: Gary Crandall <maliburevue@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 21:25:03 -0800 (PST)
Any thief who steals a Tiger generally knows what they are taking, unless it is just for a joy ride. They would obviously know that the fuel pump is electric and that it should be activated, when the
/html/tigers/2006-02/msg00079.html (7,861 bytes)

10. RE: Theft Deterrent (score: 1)
Author: "Theo Smit" <theo.smit@dynastream.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:51:17 -0700
The MSD6-AL allows you to use the 'other' trigger input (i.e. if you're using the magnetic sensor, then you use the points trigger wire, and vice versa) as an ignition disable device - just switch it
/html/tigers/2006-02/msg00084.html (7,673 bytes)

11. Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: MACHWIL@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 20:30:04 EDT
Old subject, possibly new system. I don't recall this one. _www.powerlock.com_ (http://www.powerlock.com) Bud W (http://www.poerlock.com)
/html/tigers/2006-05/msg00115.html (6,318 bytes)

12. Re: Theft deterrent (score: 1)
Author: Theo Smit <theo.smit@dynastream.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 22:16:48 -0600
Interesting... but they kind of play fast and loose with terminology with statements like "we create an open ignition circuit that disables the starting circuitry at the starter". The starter doesn't
/html/tigers/2006-05/msg00117.html (8,134 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu