Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Timing\s+vs\.\s+cooling\s+efficiency\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Timing\s+vs\.\s+cooling\s+efficiency\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Timing vs. cooling efficiency (score: 1): Author: "Charles D. Sorkin" <cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 15:28:43 -0500; Dear List: Over the summer, the '74 Midget experienced some problems in relation to overheating while sitting in traffic. Several others on the list commented that they had minimal trouble in any sor; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00230.html (8,599 bytes)
2. Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency (score: 1): Author: Lancer7676@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 16:41:52 EST; << I was wondering if perhaps poorly set timing could be responsible for interfereing with the cooling efficiency. >> Absolutely, Charles. According to my main resource person, if you set the timng t; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00234.html (7,755 bytes)
3. Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency (score: 1): Author: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>; Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 17:01:48 -0500; When you flushed the radiator, did you actually run the engine with the flush compund in the system? I found I had to do this a couple of times before the coolant was clear. Timing is also critical.; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00237.html (9,988 bytes)
4. Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 09:16:32 +1100; Too much advance will cause detonation (pining, pinging). Overheating in traffic is more likely not enough advance (timing is too far retarded) Mike; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00242.html (8,686 bytes)
5. Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency (score: 1): Author: RBHouston@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 19:04:43 EST; << I dumped some Alumaseal powder into the expansion tank, the car has an oil cooler, and it has a 160 degree thermostat. >> You might look for something to take the Alumaradiator plugger out... If y; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00244.html (7,868 bytes)
6. Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency (score: 1): Author: "Andy Webster" <trunkie@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 03:27:51 GMT; This is a dangerous move.... The concentration of corrosion inhibitors will be too low to protect the metal from the glycol, which is still corrosive even at low concentrations. Most good antifrezes; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00253.html (8,351 bytes)
7. Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency (score: 1): Author: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>; Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 00:03:25 -0500; I wondered about this myself and contacted Redline before using the product. According to their tech support, WW contains corrosion inhibitors, supposedly enough to replace the inhibitors in typical; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00259.html (10,024 bytes)
8. Re: Timing vs. cooling efficiency (score: 1): Author: Ron Soave <soavero@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 21:31:07 -0800 (PST); If we're mixing "anti-freeze" solution here, not just glycol, isn't the concentration of the corrosion inhibitors to ethylene glycol in the anti freeze constant? == Ron Soave "A Fool and His Money C; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00261.html (7,840 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]