Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tool\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tool\s+Question\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Tool Question (score: 1): Author: "Mike Lazarowicz" <tllaz@cros.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 10:13:18 -0400; Has anyone heard of TRUPER TOOLS ? I have recently found a source for this brand of tools. They appear to be of a very very high quality, better than craftsman more like Snap-On. The wrenches are in; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00016.html (7,768 bytes)
2. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: "TONY CLARK" <lotus.tony@airmail.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 10:27:25 -0500; They have a page at www.truper.com . They are a Mexican company and they do seem to be the manufacturers of a broad range of tools. The page is in Spanish which, unfortunately, I am not able to read; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00018.html (8,174 bytes)
3. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: "Michael D. Porter" <mporter@zianet.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 14:20:17 -0600; The wrenches are in a high quality polished crime finish. Ummm.... with that description, maybe the outlets move around a lot.... Cheers. -- Michael D. Porter Roswell, NM [mailto:mporter@zianet.com]; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00020.html (7,912 bytes)
4. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: shiples@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 14:57:50 -0700; But will the chrome last? My 35yo craftsman seem to be holding up while my 20yo craftsman don't seem to be holding up as well. I recently bought a snapon wrench off the truck and a craftsman professi; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00021.html (8,263 bytes)
5. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: Scott Hall <scott.hall@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 19:09:23 -0400; I can't say about the edelbroks, but I *really* like my mac wrenches, at least compared to snap-on. don't get me wrong, the macs do have squared handles for that occasional palm dent, but the snap-on; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00022.html (10,052 bytes)
6. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: dirtbeard <dirtbeard@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 16:23:11 -0700; For over 30 years I have been a big fan of SK tools. I mostly work on motorcycles and old English cars, and have found SK's to be among the thinnest wall and slimmest design of the popular brands. Th; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00023.html (8,320 bytes)
7. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: nick brearley <nick@landform.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 10:52:52 +0100; Anyone tried "twist shank wrenches" as seen at http://www.sealey.co.uk/PLPagebuilder.asp?gotonode=ViewProduct&method=mViewProduct&ProductID=5621&ignorepromotion=true . (You may need to register first; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00025.html (8,704 bytes)
8. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: Martin Evans <mcemail@dial.pipex.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 01:07:26 +0100; On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 10:52:52 +0100, nick brearley Seen it in the catalogue but snap on guy locally doesn't have one on van. 100 quid + is a bit much to sample one. Care to give us a run down on how t; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00032.html (8,150 bytes)
9. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: nick brearley <nick@landform.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 10:45:00 +0100; Two joints, one a conventional ratchet and the other a lockable swivel next to the head. In practice the swivel can be locked through 360 degrees but I would not like to put too much strain on the sp; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00034.html (9,200 bytes)
10. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: David Scheidt <dmschei@attglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:16:58 -0500; Have you used mac's "zero degree" ratchets? What are they like? David /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00048.html (7,951 bytes)
11. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: Scott Hall <scott.hall@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 21:50:05 -0400; I'm not sure what the zero degree ratchets are. are they the high tooth-count ones? if they are, I'd still go with the facom ratchets, just on cost. I think the macs are 45 tooth double pawl for 4-de; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00058.html (9,393 bytes)
12. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: David Scheidt <dmschei@attglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 02:15:50 -0500; They're gearless, I think. Mac claims no lash, and thus a zero degree ratchet increment. Like everyone else, I deal with things that have tight spots, and things that make it easier are handier. ///; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00068.html (8,046 bytes)
13. Re: Tool Question (score: 1): Author: Martin Evans <mcemail@dial.pipex.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:03:03 +0100; For the geeks amongst us, what do you mean I'm the only one? http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/srchnum.htm and key in 5419221. This brings up the original patent and few drawings illustrating construct; /html/shop-talk/2003-07/msg00075.html (9,541 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]