Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Torque\s+and\s+Horsepower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Torque\s+and\s+Horsepower\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Torque and Horsepower (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:10:01 -0800; Just to throw water on the simmering missives: Talk about speaking at cross purposes. Break out the Mechanical Engineering textbooks, and lets all talk the same issue. We have owners, who are knowled; /html/tigers/2005-02/msg00201.html (10,395 bytes)
2. Re: Torque and Horsepower (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:47:26 -0800; Yup, horsepower is a derived parameter. I think generally hp means the rate at which torque is doing work, like ft-lb per second or minute. Or is that lb-feet / sec ? I don't know..it is so hard to b; /html/tigers/2005-02/msg00204.html (11,735 bytes)
3. Re: Torque and Horsepower (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:33:49 -0800 (PST); It's not so much that the horsepower itself is derived... it's just that we can't directly measure horspower and we can easily measure torque, so we're left to calculate the HP. What we generally cal; /html/tigers/2005-02/msg00207.html (8,630 bytes)
4. Re: Torque and Horsepower (score: 1): Author: Tom Hall <modtiger@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:39:02 -0800; I seem to be overly prolific tonight for no particular reason. It all boils down to the compromises you want to make for your favorite application. Those that really want to run open track events are; /html/tigers/2005-02/msg00210.html (10,011 bytes)
5. Re: Torque and Horsepower (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:44:24 EST; I can't understand why anyone would want an effective 5th gear ratio which would spin the motor over 2000-2500rpm at 70mph. 5th should be a deep overdrive, IMHO. You do all of your racing, obviously; /html/tigers/2005-02/msg00219.html (7,979 bytes)
6. Re: Torque and Horsepower (score: 1): Author: garywinblad@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:04:56 +0000; YES Mike, you are right on. 1950rpm at 70 with the wide ratio T-5 and 2.88 gears. Works GREAT for me. And the 5.0L with stock cam is really enough for my street use. Gary -- Original message --; /html/tigers/2005-02/msg00220.html (8,529 bytes)
7. Re: Torque and Horsepower (score: 1): Author: RMEbstein@aol.com; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:17:10 EST; I will second that motion. My Brand X car has a Tremec TKO600 with a 0.64 5th gear and travels the freeways at 70 mph at about 2,100 rpm and pulls hard in 5th. The greatest single mod that anyone can; /html/tigers/2005-02/msg00222.html (7,168 bytes)
8. Re: Torque and Horsepower (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:17:19 -0800 (PST); Your probably right... I have found as I get older (and older) that much of what in theory is the optimal performance setup offers limited real benefit compared to the compromised real world use. I; /html/tigers/2005-02/msg00228.html (8,554 bytes)
9. Re: Torque and Horsepower (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:13:15 EST; <<Your probably right... I have found as I get older (and older) that much of what in theory is the optimal performance setup offers limited real benefit compared to the compromised real world use. I; /html/tigers/2005-02/msg00253.html (8,449 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]