Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tube\s+Shock\s+Conversion\s+Kits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tube\s+Shock\s+Conversion\s+Kits\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Tube Shock Conversion Kits (score: 1): Author: Bill Snyder <wtsnyder@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:39:12 -0400; Can folks on the list who have had experience with tube shock conversion kits make comments on their experiences? More specifically, has anyone had positive or negative experiences with the kits now; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00532.html (7,216 bytes)
2. Re: Tube Shock Conversion Kits (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:15:38 -0700; I couldn't find that one, but there was a rear setup from a guy in Ohio. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2434525963&cat egory=34200 The rear is pretty straightforward. S; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00536.html (8,680 bytes)
3. Re: Tube Shock Conversion Kits (score: 1): Author: ATWEDITOR@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:51:31 EDT; I've got the type that Moss sells, with Monroe shocks. I personally like what I consider better handling, although I must admit the shocks are a bit harder than the originals. I contend that they eli; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00539.html (7,447 bytes)
4. Re: Tube Shock Conversion Kits (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:26:29 EDT; In a message dated 9/25/2003 5:02:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ATWEDITOR@aol.com writes: Others on this list hold strong opinions that the tube shock switch is a collasal waste of time. There is a ve; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00541.html (8,038 bytes)
5. Re: Tube Shock Conversion Kits (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:11:42 -0600; My 72B had the tube shock conversion by the DPO. He went back to the stock front shocks after one of the tube shocks failed and put a whole in the firewall somehow. And I converted the rear shocks ba; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00544.html (8,688 bytes)
6. Re: Tube Shock Conversion Kits (score: 1): Author: JAMES SCHULTE <schultejim@prodigy.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:09:35 -0700 (PDT); I had tube shocks on front and rear of my 70B and put new springs on the rear and thought my kids had gone through a boxing match. I put lever shocks on the rear and presto!! The ride was great.I ha; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00545.html (7,807 bytes)
7. Re: Tube Shock Conversion Kits (score: 1): Author: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:03:41 -0400; Peter is also very honest and straight foreward. I called him to ask how to ship and pay for rebuilding my TR250 rear lever shocks. All he had to do was tell me where to ship them and how much $ to s; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00550.html (9,013 bytes)
8. Re: Tube Shock Conversion Kits (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:37:15 +0100; I have one car with levers and one with telescopic which also has a rear anti-roll bar and uprated front bar. I have to have the tubulars on their softest setting or the ride is way too harsh. It 's; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00553.html (7,883 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]