Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Value\:\s+Midget\s+vs\.\s+B\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Value\:\s+Midget\s+vs\.\s+B\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: Kevin Smith <ksmith40@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:54:08 -0500; In the lists opinion, If I found two equally original cars both from any given year, one a Midget, the other a B, which would have the greater value? Now, I'm not talking about "special" versions of; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00528.html (7,598 bytes)
2. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: <ptegler@cablespeed.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:18:11 -0400; just about the same to restore. checking a few sites... seems to confirm your impression about resale prices. HHmm... well... I too..did sell my '73 Midget for more than I'd expect to get for my BGT; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00529.html (8,494 bytes)
3. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <rick@stoolhead.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 10:27:21 -0500; I will accept an appropriate quantity of gold for my restored Midget. :-o; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00535.html (7,737 bytes)
4. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:34:36 -0700; Well, they made more B's in total, but as a larger, more expensive vehicle to begin with, all other things being equal, they should still be worth more. Maybe it's just that Midget sellers are more i; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00544.html (8,672 bytes)
5. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <rick@stoolhead.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:16:19 -0500; LOL! Uh, perhaps you can tell us why people who sell 'lesser' cars for MORE money are classed 'ignorant'? :-P Rick, Midget owner (and a few other toys; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00553.html (8,070 bytes)
6. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:29:59 -0700; It's not ignorant if it actually sells, of course (caveat emptor), but I believe it was the "asking" prices that were being disparaged. But you're right -- I should have said it was Midget BUYERS tha; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00554.html (8,495 bytes)
7. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <rick@stoolhead.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:08:27 -0500; I should have said it was Midget BUYERS that were more ignorant! LOL! Zing! Actually, I traded a non-running '70 Lotus Europa project for this restored '76 Midget. :-] The goal was to get a toy car t; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00558.html (7,930 bytes)
8. RE: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: "Richard Rivenbark" <rrivenbark@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 23:29:49 -0400; Maybe we Midget owners recognize the superior handling qualities of the Midgets vs B's. :) Tad 74 RWA Midget 69 MGC-GT Well, they made more B's in total, but as a larger, more expensive vehicle to be; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00559.html (8,699 bytes)
9. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 23:00:03 -0500; Gee Max; out of the frying pan and into the fire! ;^) CR; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00560.html (8,637 bytes)
10. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: David Breneman <david_breneman@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:29:10 -0700 (PDT); Having never driver a Midget, I'm curious as to how the interior room (especially leg room) compares to an MGB. One of the things that drew me to the MGB as my first car (I'm 6' 4") was that it was f; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00562.html (7,939 bytes)
11. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <rick@stoolhead.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:56:22 -0500; Thanks Tad. As long as we continue to laugh at our comments and differences we are okay. As soon as we take them seriously, we are no better than Triumph owners! :-P rick; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00565.html (7,837 bytes)
12. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:26:35 -0500; As some on the list may remember I had a '76 1500 Midget that I bought for Peg to run around town in. It was a clean little car that had a bunch of little things wrong mechanically, lots of them beca; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00579.html (9,275 bytes)
13. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:06:01 -0700; I'm 6' 1", with long legs, average torso, small feet. A B has more leg room than I can use. A CB Midget is a major squeeze -- with the seat back against the bulkhead I can barely wrap my legs around; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00582.html (8,634 bytes)
14. Re: Value: Midget vs. B (score: 1): Author: Flavin122500@cs.com; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:00:57 EDT; FWIW I'm wellpast the "boy racer" stage, and, other roadsters are enyoyable, but my 75 Midget just tickles me. I recently drove a Miata, and it is way more practical a car, but the Midget is much mor; /html/mgs/2004-06/msg00633.html (7,464 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]