Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Valve\s+rocker\s+to\s+head\s+assembly\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Valve\s+rocker\s+to\s+head\s+assembly\.\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: john.kahoon@juno.com (John c Kahoon); Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 06:21:04 -0400; The geometry IS changed ! the rocker on the pusrod side is 1/16 higher than it was before... and moves to a position 1/16 higher when the cam pushes it up. 1/16 no big deal, more ... ? But I'm sure i; /html/mgs/1998-09/msg00001.html (9,139 bytes)
2. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 07:53:00 -0400; Rick, I will certainly check the references you kindly provided. Interesting comments on my original post. I still think that within "normal" limits that milling the head won't change the geometry. B; /html/mgs/1998-09/msg00005.html (10,629 bytes)
3. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: neil.cairns@virgin.net; Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 14:30:41 -0700; The overall geometry of the actions of the valve train must be affected, if the head is skimmed. Adjusting the rocker adjuster-screw up will NOT compensate for it, as the push rod is still the same l; /html/mgs/1998-09/msg00008.html (10,102 bytes)
4. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: "Robert Allen" <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 13:49:52 -0500; Someone mark the calendar and keep an eye on the suspect. I'm off to see if I can round up that bird. -- Bob Allen, Kansas City "A group of white South Africans recently killed a black lawyer because; /html/mgs/1998-09/msg00035.html (7,337 bytes)
5. Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: Hicks <hicks@mohawk.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 21:59:23 -0400; I need some technical help from the experts out there on my 70 B I am reasembling the rocker assembly to the head and remember at least one gasket under one of the rocker posts between the bottom of; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01736.html (7,769 bytes)
6. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: cgmoog@ibm.net; Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 23:43:01 -0400; Shims go under the center two posts the outer two do not have them. Don't know the thickness since they are under the posts. Chris; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01744.html (7,600 bytes)
7. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 23:23:11 -0500; Well, this may not apply, but when skimming the head or the block to get a little more compression, you effectively move the rocker shaft closer to the cam. This messes up the desired pushrod geometr; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01748.html (8,162 bytes)
8. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 21:59:17 -0700; Hate to jump in a criticize one of Mr. Allen's learned contributions but I just gotta........ If your head were machined a lot (say 1/16" or more), shims under all four pedestals would restore the or; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01751.html (9,667 bytes)
9. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: neil.cairns@virgin.net; Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 07:58:26 -0700; The 'gaskets' are infact ten-thou shims, often placed there to make up for any head skimming that may have been done. The .010" lifts the whole set of rockers, and is supposed to put the rocker-arms; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01753.html (8,720 bytes)
10. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: Hicks <hicks@mohawk.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 19:07:05 -0400; Thanks to all for the assistance on my shim question. My recollection is there were two but I could not remember from which two posts. They were thin about .010". The engine is original, I have owned; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01795.html (9,507 bytes)
11. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 20:29:15 -0400; Okay, I'm gonna jump in here without any of the usual "IMHO" caveats and say that this business about "changing the geometry of the rocker gear when you machine the head" is not correct. If someone p; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01798.html (8,845 bytes)
12. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 21:56:13 -0500; "If the head and block have been skimmed substantially, the pressed steel rockers can foul the springs or retainers just on the curved section nearest the spring." -- Tuning BL's A Series Engine, pag; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01805.html (7,560 bytes)
13. Re: Valve rocker to head assembly. (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 23:31:27 EDT; On Mon, 31 Aug 1998 20:29:15 -0400 Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com> Well, I'm gonna jump in on Lawrie's side. In theory what you say is correct. The problem tho, is as you state. The push rod is st; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01812.html (9,718 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]