Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*baffles\s+vs\s+accusump\s+vs\s+oil\s+cooler\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*baffles\s+vs\s+accusump\s+vs\s+oil\s+cooler\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. baffles vs accusump vs oil cooler (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.cx>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:30:44 -0700; Excuse the crosspost from my BBS at www.mgbexperience.com/bbs ... I was thinking about putting a baffle in the oil pan during this engine rebuild, since I plan on autocrossing the B next year. Don't; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00694.html (7,829 bytes)
2. Re: baffles vs accusump vs oil cooler (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:09:29 EDT; That's a standard thing to do - very few people bother with the more vulnerable deep sump, which was really intended for long distance events. We don't need them for sprint racing (1/2 hour sort of e; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00715.html (8,819 bytes)
3. Re: baffles vs accusump vs oil cooler (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.cx>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:20:39 -0700; Thanks for the advice! I'll do the baffle & keep the oil cooler. I assume everyone recommends replacing the oil cooler & lines, even though they are only 3 years old and the engine did NOT end in a c; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00722.html (7,476 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]