- 1. data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Odom <popms@thegrid.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:22:49 -0800
- List, OK I can't stand it any longer. With Glen out of town and Keith in love it's too quiet so I'll start something. We are going to get a data recorder for the car this year. So let me know what on
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00371.html (7,735 bytes)
- 2. RE: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 23:43:09 -0600
- for "bang for the buck" (especially number of usable/configurable channels) I really like Bill Smith's Edelbrock "QwikData" that we used last year in Skip Higginbotham's "Yellow Rose of Texas" (now
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00372.html (9,036 bytes)
- 3. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:36:10 -0500
- The Edelbrock Quick data is the absolute best bang for the buck I have seen. For the money you will be hard pressed to get as many channels and the recording time is more than long enough for LSR wor
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00373.html (9,960 bytes)
- 4. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Rick Byrnes <Rick@rbmotorsports.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:16:49 -0500
- Gee such a coincidence, I have a Performance Measurement Systems (PMS) with 2 pods and harnesses for sale complete, but without sensors and thermocouples, for around $1,000 It has never been used. I
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00375.html (8,100 bytes)
- 5. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:28:53 -0700
- we have an edelbrock quick data, and really like it, VERY user friendly Joe :) /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo ///
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00381.html (8,218 bytes)
- 6. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:27:40 -0800
- Bec ause I want to use one I am starting to contact folks who sell them and check out websights. The first place I went were to are the advertisers in the SCTA rule book. Computech was very heplful s
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00384.html (8,568 bytes)
- 7. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 21:15:20 -0600
- I've really enjoyed the quick data as well.... Keith ( just back from Iowa....and yes I really do think it's a State... damn have they got some corn feed woman up there... whew... ) -- Original Messa
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00386.html (9,250 bytes)
- 8. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 07:17:28 -0500
- If Performance trends never called back what do you suppose the tech help might be if you have a problem?? I have never seen the Computech software so i have no comment on it at all. But also have no
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00389.html (9,197 bytes)
- 9. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 05:05:05 -0500
- If you look at their web site you can download the software for free and see what you are getting into as well. Sometimes the software will tell you more than any sales brochure ever will. Dave /// u
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00407.html (9,234 bytes)
- 10. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 05:53:40 -0500
- Battery and 2 accelerometers are missing /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archiv
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00409.html (9,352 bytes)
- 11. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:18:46 -0800
- You have made the most important statement in this interesting thread: BAD DATA IS MUCH WORSE THAN NO DATA Bad gages or an eyeball glitch are bad enough, but a logger can add enormously to the garba
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00413.html (8,649 bytes)
- 12. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "Waldron, James" <James.Waldron@CWUSA.COM>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:06:13 -0500
- I'm kind of a 'roll my own' kind of guy. Does anyone know exactly how O2 sensors work. I know they have a special coating. Do they require power? Is it just a change in Resistance depending on how mu
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00415.html (8,571 bytes)
- 13. RE: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:23:27 -0600
- Check out this site for a wideband Lambda sensor project: http://www.diy-efi.org/diy_efi/projects/diy_wb/ Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ I'm kind of a 'roll my own' kind of guy. Does anyone know exactly h
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00416.html (8,901 bytes)
- 14. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:30:14 -0800
- There are two basic types of O2 sensors. One produces a voltage (zirconium element) it is a battery that functions by comparing the levels of oxygen in the exhaust and in the atmosphere. The larger
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00417.html (9,484 bytes)
- 15. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:45:32 -0700
- JD, I did not buy a package for the bike, I bought the basic box, then spec'd the same series transducers from MSP, that is what Edelelbrock uses, I got same series (600), same specs, only difference
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00418.html (9,724 bytes)
- 16. RE: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:43:35 -0600
- Great info. Russ, #1226B I think what it really comes down to is what do you want to measure and what budget do you have.. Most things can be done in various ways with different degrees of accuracy
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00419.html (10,335 bytes)
- 17. RE: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:02:49 -0600
- re: your comment "Bad gages or an eyeball glitch are bad enough, but a logger can add enormously to the garbage information load"-- I completely agree. I have encountered many cases in my "industria
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00420.html (9,303 bytes)
- 18. RE: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:40:41 -0600
- I sure don't endorse these circuits but that site is one place to begin some research on the subject of O2 sensors. DIY projects are always fraught with uncertainty. The "designer" may know less abo
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00421.html (9,497 bytes)
- 19. RE: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: "Waldron, James" <James.Waldron@CWUSA.COM>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:47:15 -0500
- Wow! Everything I wanted to know and more (gotta love the knowledgeable people on this list). Thank you very much. Jim W. Jim, There are two basic types of O2 sensors. One produces a voltage (zircon
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00422.html (9,349 bytes)
- 20. Re: data recorder (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 06:43:49 -0500
- I have to ask what bad data did the edelbrock unit give you? You may have not believed it or thought it wrong but was the data wrong. NOt necessarily as an absolute number but as a trend or indicatio
- /html/land-speed/2003-02/msg00440.html (10,123 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu