Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*four\s+rings\s+on\s+TR3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*four\s+rings\s+on\s+TR3\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. four rings on TR3 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Wallace" <grandfatherjim@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:24:12 -0500; Not sure if this is the connection but some of the Ferguson tractor pistons had the fourth ring - it's another oil scraper. Here is a page from my Ferguson website showing this: http://www.geocities; /html/triumphs/2006-03/msg00329.html (7,615 bytes)
2. RE: four rings on TR3 (score: 1): Author: CFisher@borgwarner.com; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:40:13 -0600; Jim wrote: some of the Ferguson tractor pistons had the fourth ring - it's another oil scraper. Here is a page from my Ferguson website showing this: <http://www.geocities.com/wallaces_23/oldpiston.h; /html/triumphs/2006-03/msg00330.html (7,855 bytes)
3. Re: four rings on TR3 (score: 1): Author: zoboherald@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:49:27 -0500; In case you wonder why I reference the Ferguson at all, it's because the piston and liner sets from either TR or Fergie will fit in either block. The Fergies had 80 mm, or later, 85 mm pistons. You c; /html/triumphs/2006-03/msg00331.html (7,714 bytes)
4. Re: four rings on TR3 (score: 1): Author: ZinkZ10C@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:04:34 EST; << Meanwhile, I've heard tales from "old-timers" that way back when (i.e., perhaps before the 86mm piston and liner option was introduced), folks would use "Fergie" 85mm pistons and liners for the in; /html/triumphs/2006-03/msg00350.html (7,378 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]