- 1. Re: light - was benches (score: 1)
- Author: James R Ferguson <jferg@twave.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 96 09:41:48 -0500 (EST)
- I thought that the $5 lights had an "electronic" ballast not the better transformer type. Thus, a poor startup, but lower price. -- Jim Ferguson
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00476.html (7,192 bytes)
- 2. Re: light - was benches (score: 1)
- Author: Len Bugel <bugel@miranda.fnal.gov>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 09:02:50 +0000
- Having used fluorescent lights in both the 110V AC world and the 12V DC world, I would question whether the transformer ballast is in any way 'better'. IMHO, the electronic ballast is not only cheape
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00478.html (7,231 bytes)
- 3. Re: light - was benches (score: 1)
- Author: moses@csra.net (Tim Moses)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:06:50 -0700
- So, should I mount a $5 flourescent lamp on a pole to provide light when working under the hood, or shoule I shell out $40 and get the DUAL halogen lamps????? I am dying to light up the world, but a
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00488.html (7,325 bytes)
- 4. Re: light - was benches (score: 1)
- Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrington.com (Mark Jurras)
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 08:39:16 -0500
- Let's look at some other aspects: The $5 Flourescent uses ~40 watts per bulb assumung 2 bulbs 80 watts. For Arguments sake @ $0.10/KWH for electricity $0.008/hr The Dual 500 watt halogen lamps. Both
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00500.html (7,797 bytes)
- 5. Re: light - was benches (score: 1)
- Author: Don Mathis <tdm@smtp-gw.ak.att.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 12:03:30 -0500
- Home Depot sells a rectangular, 300 watt, halogen flood light for $8.65. I use them for floods for my home. I also mounted one on an old projection screen tripod when the screen died. 'Painted the wh
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00520.html (7,642 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu