Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*polishing\/waxing\s+a\s+car\s+with\s+orbital\s+waxer\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. polishing/waxing a car with orbital waxer.. (score: 1)
Author: JNiolon@uss.com
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 13:40:31 -0500
I'd like to go into a little more detail than Chris... I figure the best waxer is the high amperage unit.. 11" or so on the buffer pad... (the ufo looking one)... so after I spend a hundred bucks on
/html/shop-talk/2002-05/msg00057.html (7,627 bytes)

2. RE: polishing/waxing a car with orbital waxer.. (score: 1)
Author: "Mullen, Tim" <Tim.Mullen@trw.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 16:09:54 -0400
First, you can use the three step process (or more), or use a cleaner For the three step process: Step one, you use a "fine cut cleaner" - this is slightly abrasive and cleans the surface and removes
/html/shop-talk/2002-05/msg00058.html (9,439 bytes)

3. Re: polishing/waxing a car with orbital waxer.. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Shipley <shiples@attbi.com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 14:12:18 -0700
You should be able to get a presentation from your local Meguire's representative if you can get a group of enthusiasts together. I've seen the presentations by Griot and Maguire's and it's a comple
/html/shop-talk/2002-05/msg00061.html (8,152 bytes)

4. RE: polishing/waxing a car with orbital waxer.. (score: 1)
Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 14:32:21 -0700
I learned a few weeks ago that there is an important distinction between a random orbit waxer and a buffer. The pad on the waxer does not spin once it contacts the vehicle, it only moves in small ci
/html/shop-talk/2002-05/msg00062.html (7,680 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu