Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+tube\s+shock\s+conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+tube\s+shock\s+conversion\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. rear tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: G Graham <ggraham@edcen.ehhs.cmich.edu>; Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 21:30:43 -0400; Have any of you done this conversion to a RBB? Thanks, Gary (rebushed front end today - nicer ride now); /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00279.html (6,534 bytes)
2. Re:rear tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Nferre@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 22:15:39 EDT; Have any of you done this conversion to a RBB? Thanks, Gary (rebushed front end today - nicer ride now) Yes Gary, I did a rear (and front) telescopic shock conversion on my 79 B last winter. The diff; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00283.html (6,928 bytes)
3. Re: rear tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Art Pfenninger <ch155@freenet.buffalo.edu>; Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 13:00:49 -0400 (EDT); I have on a 77 and it works great.; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00311.html (6,714 bytes)
4. rear tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Ray Wygonik <rwygonik@grove.iup.edu>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:45:23 -0500; Decide to undertake a rear tube shock conversion myself. Originally was going to buy the Moss kit but read on Skye's page that the shock Moss provides is far too stiff. Yesterday I bought two Monroe; /html/mgs/1999-02/msg01324.html (7,712 bytes)
5. RE: rear tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Erin Matzen <sunflower@networksplus.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:28:37 -0600; I have also decided to go with a tube shock conversion on the rear end. I bought the Spax shock conversion kit from British Victoria, pretty expensive, but I am really hoping I get good results, I a; /html/mgs/1999-02/msg01325.html (8,511 bytes)
6. Re: rear tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: EricSsmc@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:57:51 EST; Actually, the front hole is where you want to mount the shock for extra rear axle stability. Mounting shock on an angle not only provides damping for the shock but also helps to keep the rear axle f; /html/mgs/1999-02/msg01326.html (7,457 bytes)
7. Re: rear tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Carl Elliott <grunt2@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:52:39 -0500; For the lower mounts, The chevy Impalas and other big GMs had a shock mount that unbolted with a spacer, These were on 73 to early 80s. This was on the rears, Fits Fine. Carl E.; /html/mgs/1999-02/msg01328.html (8,232 bytes)
8. Re: rear tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: "Paul Tegler " <wizardz@amdyne.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:46:39 -0500; you might run into travel distance problems on the rear mount if you have a CB car due to the lower ride hieght. On a rubber bumper you might be OK. More vertical will make them stiffer layed down (f; /html/mgs/1999-02/msg01329.html (9,197 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]