Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rws\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rws\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. rws (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:46:20 -0500; The UW did a rws car back in '81, a 50cc chainsaw motor and electrical conduit, the problem for it was that the very long wheelbase coupled with a tricycle rear steered wheel and a driver only a coup; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00033.html (8,114 bytes)
2. RE: rws (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:06:23 -0500; People are always re-inventing the "three-wheeled car" for some reason. It is a terrible configuration handling-wise. The end with a single wheel has zero roll stiffness. Different is not always bet; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00036.html (8,688 bytes)
3. RE: rws (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:22:12 -0500; I have always been thinking of a tricycle layout, but with 4 wheels, with the rear wheels tandem...although this does not alleviate the triangle configuration, it does help somewhat.... John Robinson; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00037.html (9,903 bytes)
4. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:10:25 -0700; John, the power steering was exactly what I was thinking. Only make it so that the driver feels no input from the system. He turns the wheel so many degrees and the road wheel turns as it is supposed; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00039.html (9,249 bytes)
5. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:13:05 -0700; Was it faster than Jack's 50 cc bike liner? With 3 wheels it could also qualify as a bike... mayf -- Original Message -- From: "john robinson" <john@engr.wisc.edu> To: <land-speed@autox.team.net> Sen; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00040.html (8,963 bytes)
6. RE: rws (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 16:28:57 -0500; I recognize that an LSR car is a special case. In LSR, the reduction of frontal area is so important that it may warrant going to a quasi-tricycle configuration. I just wanted to point out the big c; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00041.html (10,239 bytes)
7. rws (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:28:38 -0500; OK seems Mayf says the inputs from the driver are one cause of instability, due to PIO (pilot induced oscillation) but he does not say that the car is unstable. maybe power assisted steering IS what; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00058.html (7,465 bytes)
8. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 06:23:07 -0500; If I own something I'm most likely going to drive it fast... and I own 3 forklifts.... I know rear steer is ugly at speed.... no matter if I put it in or it's a design flaw... slow speed it's just ok; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00059.html (9,066 bytes)
9. RE: rws (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 08:51:17 -0500; and I snipped some...... yes this is the PIO we have been discussing...the only correction factor that would be available to the driver would be the sightline of the driver/vehicle and the direction; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00060.html (10,303 bytes)
10. rws (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 07:32:52 -0700; So make a **8 What happens if you need to steer around a soft spot or pothole? Wheelspin corrections after driving through said pothole, half the driven wheels in the soft spot? Bonner Denton seems t; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00062.html (8,148 bytes)
11. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:49:21 -0500; Why Buckwheat... what you thinking...... TRACTION Control takes care of the soft spots..... LOL the; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00064.html (8,550 bytes)
12. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:39:04 -0700; List; I'm with Keith here. I have not jumped in here since I don't much care, but I have been wondering what the advantage of RWS is. I don't see it. RF -- Original Message -- From: "Keith Turk" <ktu; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00087.html (8,693 bytes)
13. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:53:27 -0700; It allows you to spin out sooner and faster. have; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00088.html (9,239 bytes)
14. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:58:13 -0500; partly this discussion is just an exercise in bench racing, partly its' because the powers that be have restricted the Streamliner class lately, re: no RWS, no Traction control, partly because a few; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00089.html (9,834 bytes)
15. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:24:52 -0500; This type of discussion is exactly what the list is for.... other then Joe's social entertainment.... K -- Original Message -- From: "john robinson" <john@engr.wisc.edu> To: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.c; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00090.html (10,656 bytes)
16. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:44:49 -0400; Don't let that phrase of 'unlimited innovation' fool you too much The innovation is very closely regulated and controlled in all ways. if it were unlimited i could build a RWS car with traction contr; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00093.html (8,974 bytes)
17. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 15:02:51 -0600; 760+mph with rear steer aint a bad bench mark if ya can make it work at 760, then it CAN work at 175-200-300-400+ mph or the world is always flat unless you can see the curvature Joe :); /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00097.html (10,489 bytes)
18. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 14:06:33 -0700; It would seem to me that "Unlimited Innovation" has to fall within the confines of safety rules. Being open minded is great, but we shouldn't be so open minded that our brains fall out. I have been; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00098.html (10,025 bytes)
19. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 14:14:48 -0700; We keep getting reference to the Noble car concerning rws. I wonder just how much the steering input has to do with direction of the Thrust car when the burners are lit. I suspect the the aerodynami; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00099.html (8,355 bytes)
20. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:25:42 -0700; Shame on you Dave :(........ J.D. -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> To: "john robinson" <john@engr.wisc.edu> Cc: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.n; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00102.html (9,491 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]