Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*should\s+I\s+undercoat\s+my\s+\-\-\-\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*should\s+I\s+undercoat\s+my\s+\-\-\-\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. should I undercoat my --- (score: 1): Author: Bill Pollock <wjpollock@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:19:12 -0400; I used painter thinner to take mine off. Tried a number of things and found thinner worked best with the least amount of flumes and combustion ability. Had to soaked the coating ahead of while I was; /html/healeys/2004-08/msg00365.html (7,264 bytes)
2. Re: should I undercoat my --- (score: 1): Author: "Bob Spidell" <bspidell@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:44:53 -0700; Never tried it with undercoating, but "3M Adhesive Remover" seems to work well with most kinds of gooey gunk. Expensive, though. bs ** Bob Spidell San Jose, CA bspidell@pacbell.net '67 Austin-Healey; /html/healeys/2004-08/msg00367.html (7,802 bytes)
3. Re: should I undercoat my --- (score: 1): Author: "davidwjones" <davidwjones@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:00:34 -0400; I tried all kinds of stuff to remove the 40? year old undercoat on mine. I think if there were a way to keep the surface wet with a lot of those solvents for an adequate period of time for them to so; /html/healeys/2004-08/msg00370.html (7,436 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]