Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*stupid\s+timing\s+question\,\s+mkII\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*stupid\s+timing\s+question\,\s+mkII\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. stupid timing question, mkII (score: 1): Author: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring); Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 08:26:56 -0400; Fellow fiends: Many thanks to the folks who have responed to my latest posting. In defense of my car guy support group, let me say that the fellow I was mis-quoteing is really an okay fellow (he invi; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00783.html (8,383 bytes)
2. Re: stupid timing question, mkII (score: 1): Author: "John M. Trindle" <jtrindle@tsquare.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:13:54 -0400 (EDT); That's not vacuum advance, but centrifugal advance. The way you check vacuum advance is to disconnect it, and plug the hole to the manifold. Observe the timing. It should be in the 10 to 15 degree ra; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00797.html (9,029 bytes)
3. Re: stupid timing question, mkII (score: 1): Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrco.com (Mark Jurras); Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 11:14:03 -0400; Is the advance vacuum ported or manifold on my 67BGT? - -Mark; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00801.html (7,439 bytes)
4. Re: stupid timing question, mkII (score: 1): Author: BarneyMG@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 16:41:33 -0400; << I adjusted the timing down to about 12 btdc (from 15+) yesterday, and frankly, I think it runs better at 15, so I may knock it up again (so to speak). >> OK Will, I can't keep my $.02 out any long; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00806.html (9,193 bytes)
5. Re: stupid timing question, mkII (score: 1): Author: "Jason F. Dutt" <simjason@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 18:44:30 -0400; I'm not sure on the following, but someone will correct me if I'm wrong. If I remember correctly, when setting the timing on my old '79, on which the vaccum advance wasn't hooked up, the timing DID a; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00809.html (8,252 bytes)
6. Re: stupid timing question, mkII (score: 1): Author: Kevin Sullivan <kevins@borris.khoros.unm.edu>; Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 09:32:31 -0600 (MDT); Hey, I'm convinced. 20 before at what rpm? With distributor vacuum connected or disconnected? I also want to check that my valve timing is right. My timing mark on the pulley seems to be off a bit: s; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00836.html (8,225 bytes)
7. Re: stupid timing question, mkII (score: 1): Author: BarneyMG@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 03:46:13 -0400; << Hey, I'm convinced. 20 before at what rpm? With distributor vacuum connected or disconnected? << I also want to check that my valve timing is right. My timing mark on the pulley seems to be off a; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00867.html (10,023 bytes)
8. Re: stupid timing question, mkII (score: 1): Author: GOFASTMG@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 15:08:35 -0400; A quick and dirty way to check a vacuum advance unit is to crank the engine,with strobe attached to #1 plug. Un plug the vacuum advance unit and cap the tube. Observe the position of the timing mark; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00896.html (7,702 bytes)
9. Re: stupid timing question, mkII (score: 1): Author: Mike Gigante <mg@mega.cgl.rmit.edu.au>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 19:05:46 -1000; I'm a bit late jumping in on this, but if you have the vacuum advance hooked up, then when you 'rev' it, there is both centrifugal advance and vacuum advance working. To test the centrifugal advance,; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01071.html (8,050 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]