- 1. suspension bushings in ST... (score: 1)
- Author: Ghsharp@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 09:02:21 EDT
- The ST rules refer to 14.8 specifically in regard to shocks, struts, and springs, not the entire language of 14.8. I see no other specific allowance for changing suspension bushings. GH
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00712.html (7,144 bytes)
- 2. RE: suspension bushings in ST... (score: 1)
- Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 11:14:17 -0500
- The ST rules refer to 14.8 specifically in regard to shocks, struts, and springs, not the entire language of 14.8. I see no other specific allowance for changing suspension bushings. GH == That's exa
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00734.html (7,773 bytes)
- 3. Re: suspension bushings in ST... (score: 1)
- Author: Ghsharp@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 13:28:28 EDT
- Eric, There was a fair amount of member/competitor input when these rules were formulated, and we haven't seen a groundswell of interest in changing them in this area so far. But if you'd like to sug
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00752.html (7,851 bytes)
- 4. RE: suspension bushings in ST... (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Buckley" <ejbuckley@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:44:39 -0500
- Wow! This does appear to be an oversight. I just assumed it was legal given the nature of the class. I hadn't checked because I hadn't planned on doing it myself. But I know several local ST competi
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00833.html (8,020 bytes)
- 5. RE: suspension bushings in ST... (score: 1)
- Author: LiloACRguy@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:21:58 EDT
- I've been trying to find my rulebook or the online version of the rules to join this conversation, but I have not been successful. So bear with me, as this is coming from memory. The ST rules are som
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00858.html (7,657 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu