Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*torque\s+settings\s+with\s+a\s+crowsfoot\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*torque\s+settings\s+with\s+a\s+crowsfoot\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. torque settings with a crowsfoot (score: 1): Author: "Proudfoot, Andrew" <proudfa@NAVCANADA.CA>; Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 23:33:00 -0400; If you used a crowsfoot wrench on the torque wrench could you not bench test it? ie- tighten a nut & bolt in your vise both with and without the crowsfoot and compare the difference? 22lbs without wo; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00491.html (9,117 bytes)
2. Re: torque settings with a crowsfoot (score: 1): Author: REwald9535@aol.com; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 00:32:52 EDT; Nice thought but it won't work. When you tighten a bolt or nut it requires a certain force to turn it. When you stop turning it and then go to start turning it again you have to overcome the frictio; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00495.html (9,568 bytes)
3. Re: torque settings with a crowsfoot (score: 1): Author: "Proudfoot, Andrew" <proudfa@NAVCANADA.CA>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 01:13:00 -0400; Thanks for the info, sounds like an interesting class you teach, all this math business is to much for me though. (thus my previous post) I wasn't the one interested in torquing my valves just provi; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00498.html (10,187 bytes)
4. Re: torque settings with a crowsfoot (score: 1): Author: Enrique Claure <spaninc@ceibo.entelnet.bo>; Date: Sun, 07 Jan 1990 13:14:33 -0400; Great information Rick, I have to decide about a crow foot purchase for torque setting an axle bolt on my 280Z. I do have a doubt though, If I place a crow foot on my torque wrench at 90 degrees wont; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00504.html (7,803 bytes)
5. Re: torque settings with a crowsfoot (score: 1): Author: REwald9535@aol.com; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 11:14:06 EDT; About the crank, yep that Mr. Newton and his law again, static friction is greater than sliding friction. If you have ever pushed your LBC by yourself you know that it is harder to get it rolling th; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00511.html (8,222 bytes)
6. Re: torque settings with a crowsfoot (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:59:07 -0400; While for practical reasons all the effects are the same, it's important to note that when applied to a nut on a bolt, this is not a Newtonian situation. ie: The concept of inertia is not the reason; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00520.html (9,691 bytes)
7. Re: torque settings with a crowsfoot (score: 1): Author: REwald9535@aol.com; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 17:30:49 EDT; Granted I got a little hosed up with the bolts inertia Vs static/dynamic friction. However Enrique's question was about turning the crank in an engine he built. The crank does have a noticeable mass; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00524.html (11,617 bytes)
8. Re: torque settings with a crowsfoot (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 23:36:11 -0400; In one way yes, but in a lot of ways no. Turning a crank takes a bit of force. However, from my experience the crank seems to "snap" loose and once it is moving, it's straightforward to move. Once th; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00535.html (9,084 bytes)
9. Re: torque settings with a crowsfoot (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:26:03 -0500; If I used a crowfoot wrench set at 90 drgrees to the handle I'd worry more about slipping of the bolt/nut than I would about altering the torque setting. You're taling about may foot-pounds of torque; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00681.html (7,548 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]