Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Off\s+topic\s+electrical\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Off\s+topic\s+electrical\s+question\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: KingsCreekTrees@aol.com; Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:42:34 -0500 (EST); Thanks Tony and John. I did Google it, and it was the Estate. I had come across an early Estate initially, and I know it wasn't that, but I had missed the newer one. Sorry to bomb the list multiple t; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00312.html (7,348 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: <wbeech@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:28:00 -0600; It sounds like a Triumph 2500 estate and if it was navy blue it was probably a car I bought in Maine and brought to Florida. I sold it to a friend who had it until he moved to Texas and he sold it to; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00313.html (8,656 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: Bud Rolofson <levilevi@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:30:52 -0700; Is this it? http://www.flickr.com/photos/pethier/3977494559/in/set-72157622574405912/ Shot in SLO at the 2009 VTR/Triumphest. Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1973 Triumph Stag LE22439U; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00314.html (10,628 bytes)
4. Re: [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:45:09 -0800; If so, this is a 2.5 PI (fuel infected) , sold new between August 01, 1972 and July 31, 1973. In a message dated 21/01/2012 9:52:54 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, pethier@comcast.net writes: Is this it?; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00315.html (7,730 bytes)
5. Re: [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: "Alex & Janet Thomson" <aljlthomson@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:19:27 -0500; Wait until about 1:50 into it... http://www.hulu.com/watch/62003/speed-x-hot-import-nights-night-and-day mjb. ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00316.html (8,876 bytes)
6. Re: [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: John Young <jeyoung_2@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:13:35 -0800 (PST); Hi - I took some more pictures of the disc brake conversion on my car. They are the last pictures in my Flickr set at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dgunn/sets/72157602881332130/with/6740375513/ I'm n; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00317.html (9,007 bytes)
7. Re: [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: John Macartney <flywheelcoventry1@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:00:47 +0000 (GMT); anyone have a chart can give me some idea as to when this was built? thanks! ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00319.html (7,949 bytes)
8. [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: KingsCreekTrees at aol.com (KingsCreekTrees at aol.com); Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:42:34 -0500 (EST); Hi all; Perhaps someone can settle an argument between my son and I? When charging a car battery, I was always told to disconnect the battery terminals first, then connect the charger. My son, who is; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00759.html (8,439 bytes)
9. [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: wbeech at flash.net (wbeech at flash.net); Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:28:00 -0600; Tim, I am probably closer to your age, I never disconnect the battery terminals unless I am trying to do some isolation testing. But just to charge the battery or hook-up a float charger for the wint; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00760.html (10,100 bytes)
10. [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: levilevi at comcast.net (Bud Rolofson); Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:30:52 -0700; I'm also in the camp of not disconnecting the battery cables. Some manuals say when jumping/charging to ground to the engine/body and with only the positive connected to the battery and I tend to do; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00761.html (12,234 bytes)
11. [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall); Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:45:09 -0800; My opinion, there was a period in history where that was a good idea. Now, unless you are working on a car with early solid-state electronics (or an early alternator) and using a poorly regulated ba; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00762.html (9,562 bytes)
12. [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: aljlthomson at charter.net (Alex & Janet Thomson); Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:19:27 -0500; If your battery charger is of the type that tapers the charge rate as the battery reaches full charge, which most do, I see no problem with charging the battery in place. After all, that's what the g; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00763.html (10,595 bytes)
13. [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: jeyoung_2 at yahoo.com (John Young); Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:13:35 -0800 (PST); I started "fiddling" with cars about 1946. I never have disconnect the battery to put a charger on it. One time, however, I regretted that method. I had the charger turned up for starting and put too; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00764.html (9,955 bytes)
14. [TR] Off topic electrical question (score: 1): Author: flywheelcoventry1 at yahoo.co.uk (John Macartney); Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:00:47 +0000 (GMT); If we're talking about modern cars, I'd agree there's probably no need to isolate the battery for re-charging. But with older LBC's with (relatively) low output alternators and with perhaps not the s; /html/triumphs/2012-01/msg00766.html (9,201 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]