autox-cm
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CM stuff

To: Terry Green <tmgreen3@home.com>
Subject: Re: CM stuff
From: Terry Green <tmgreen3@home.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:43:19 -0500
Terry Green wrote:

> I was not thinking of the advantages, but keeping the car easier and 
> cheaper to maintain.. for example how any folks running
> Cm class do you think really do not have oversize pistons??? I know 
> when i got my car i did not know that it had 30 over pistons. I got a 
> surprise and had to have my motor rebuilt( new block) when i started 
> club racing. ..again with the fly wheels, how many are legal, if your 
> flywheel car is down to the minimum, and you have it resurface, you 
> are most likely not legal.. I was just thinking about getting a little 
> more life from the motor.. as for the electronic ignition. At one time 
> i ran a Pertronic system in my FF, not legal, but it was simple, cheap 
> and work well in the rain, and never had to adjust it.. it just made 
> life better . TG
>  
> 
>> Terry Green wrote:
>> 
>>> Just thinking about autoxing my FF again.. and I was thinking.. have
>>> anyone thought abut having our own set of rules for autoxing. Like
>>> allowing 30 over pistons, electronic ignition , lighter flywheels.
>>> using 5 gears.. Don't kill me, I am just thinking...tg
>> 
>> 
>> Why?  What's the advantage?  If we're all competing against each other,
>> making us spend money to make the cars faster doesn't seem to
>> accomplish much other than making us spend money while reducing the
>> resale value of the cars.
>> 
>> Mark

///
///  autox-cm@autox.team.net mailing list
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>